The other story of interest to me was that of the mid-wife. My dear old spinster great -aunt Doss was a mid-wife around Devizes. I remember well that she was definitely of the 'no nonsense' school when it came to applying first aid but she was much loved. The newspaper article on her retirement reckoned she must have brought 3,000 - 4,000 locals into the world and the civic dignitaries launched an appeal to fund her old age as she had been seriously under paid. Her subsequent funeral was very well attended. I am glad that such as she are getting the recognition that they deserve.
Phil
Hi Phil,
I'm glad as well!

Maybe you can answer the question I asked earlier. You say your great aunt Doss was also a midwife. I assume she was also formally qualified through the Midwifery Board? And that she remained single?
I know that nurses had to "retire" when they married. Did the marriage bar also apply to midwives?
I did ask whether it was verified that James Lynch was in fact Cecelia Lynch's husband - the head of the household didn't necessarily mean that the person was the husband. I noted he was a "cow man", maybe very handy for a mdiwife dealing with babies! But seriously, if she wasn't married to him and he was perhaps her brother or cousin for example it throws up all sorts of questions as to who the children in the household were. The programme by mentioning "head of household" could have led viewers to assume James was the husband, along with the *crossed out* "wife". But it wasn't really verified. And as we know, censuses are often a little dodgy ....
*Just to correct the above. Cecelia was married to James Lynch and married him before she started to practice. Thanks to the BBC board for this info!
From what was said in the programme, midwives were paid fees by the families whose babies they delivered. In a poverty-stricken area, this must have been very difficult. In a sense, the midwife was doing a job for, if we bring it down to pre-NHS days although the state was already encroaching with National Health Insurance for men (although not women and children), panel doctors and health boards, the councils and parishes. And of course many of the guys within the councils did get salaries and occupational pensions.
By 1948 GPs surely must have been getting a steady income from "fees" from insurance companies because National Health Insurance was administered through insurance companies "The Man from the Pru" for working men but there wasn't anything comparable for midwives? And the working men were supposed to pay for the ailments/child bearing of their wives and ailments of unmarried sisters etc as "dependents"?
There was a hotchpotch of state legislation coming in, National Health Insurance, Adoption legislation and registration, council regulations etc etc.
Maybe midwives were supposed to be dependent on the GPs and by trickle down, once the state through various health boards (and there was increased coverage for children as well through schools), county councils and insurance companies came in, were supposed to get fees from the GPs for their services and not from individuals? This might also explain why the academic in Salford was so forthright about the doctors running the Midwifery Board? Maybe the GPs were still trying to make out they were not being paid by corporations and the state to cover healthcare in their local areas?