Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: NOW COMPLETED WITH THANKS Address  (Read 3231 times)

Offline Templar75

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
NOW COMPLETED WITH THANKS Address
« on: Sunday 07 August 11 21:04 BST (UK) »
Hi Folks,

            can someone help please, I have a couple married at 35 George IV Bridge in 1905, my question is would this have been a Registrars Office ?,  below their entry there is another couple which make me think it is. If not I am  wondering if this was an Irregular Marriage please see Cert.

Cheers.

Archie.

Offline Jessie 46

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Address
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 07 August 11 22:19 BST (UK) »
Hi Archie,
               I have come across quite a few of these in different places in Edinburgh over the years as far as I was

lead to believe it was similar to being married in Registrars office today.

Cheers
Jessie

Offline Templar75

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Address
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 07 August 11 22:54 BST (UK) »
Hi Jessie

                  thanks for the info, I had read somewhere that Irregular Marriages were banned it was when I read the second last top box I thought it an was Irregular one.

Cheers and thanks again.

Archie.

Offline portybelle

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Address
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 07 August 11 23:10 BST (UK) »
Intriguing - wonder why the dates of the weddings and the dates of the warrant are so far apart?

If wedding not in a Church then I think that makes it irregular but I wonder why? Both couples single so wonder why they couldn't/didn't get married in a Church?

Sorry not answering your question!
East Lothian/Midlothian
Cowe, Cameron, Storie/Storey, Powell,
McCaskell, Kane/Cain, Howden, Duncan

For OH: East Lothian Ayrshire
Baird, Kyle, Reilly, Routledge
Mackie,Wallace, Wood, Dickson, Burrell, Brown, Darling

Offline Templar75

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Address
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 07 August 11 23:25 BST (UK) »
Hi Portybelle,

                     well noticed, I noticed that as well but dismissed it I think you are only allowed 14 days ? but I could be wrong.

Cheers.

Archie.

Offline Jessie 46

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Address
« Reply #5 on: Monday 08 August 11 11:21 BST (UK) »

Hi Portybelle and Templar,
                                          I have had a quick look at my research and  in the following years the marriages were held:-

1921 - 8, Bank Street , Edinburgh

1934  - 34, Chambers Street Edinburgh

1944  -St. Giles street Edinburgh 

I have a couple in Glasgow as well but for the life of me can't find them

They were all by Warrant of the Sheriff Substitute.

Cheers,

Jessie

Offline jessden

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Address
« Reply #6 on: Monday 08 August 11 13:08 BST (UK) »
The marriages shown on the certificate were irregular marriages.  What would have happened was that the couple would have declared before witnesses that they were accepting each other as husband and wife. That was sufficient to constitute a marriage in Scotland at that time.  They would have realised that it was desirable to have some sort of official record of their marriage.  They would therefore have submitted a statement, signed by themselves and their witnesses, to the Sheriff who would then have issued a warrant for the the marriage to be entered on the official register.  The address at 35 George IV Bridge, Edinburgh was that of the Sheriff Court.  No sort of wedding ceremony would have taken place there - it is merely the address from which the administrative process of issuing the warrant took place.

This process was used by people who either did not want a religious marriage or just wanted to avoid the formalities such a proclamation (banns).

Jessie Denholm

Offline Templar75

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Address
« Reply #7 on: Monday 08 August 11 13:33 BST (UK) »
Hi Jessie and Jessie,

                            thank you so much for your help I think the latter post has confirmed what I thought at first but the added information about the building address has really clinched it, what a great team of people we have on this site,

Again, thanks to all of you for your help.

Best regards.

Archie.

Offline Jessie 46

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: NOW COMPLETED WITH THANKS Address
« Reply #8 on: Monday 08 August 11 16:27 BST (UK) »


Hi,
      I had another look at my marriages and wonder if it could be something to do with the bride being pregnant


      and having their babies around a month after marriage.


      Cheers,


       Jessie
Pages: [1] 2