Census Mystery. COMPLETED

[silvery]

You can always use a * instead of a letter in the name, including the first letter.    In case of mis-spellings etc. 

In ancestry in 1891 they are Sunman name.

[Pentangle67]

Hi in 1901 they are shown as SINMAN RG13/4503/193/40

Keyboard86

I just looked at the 1901 census, and I cannot see them      I'm sorry, I am a bit of a novice and I only have access to one family history site. I can see Sinman listed but not ones that would be Henry/Mary & family.  The district could be either Great Yarmouth, Lincolnshire or Sculcoates(a Hull one).

Well if you use Ancestry they are under SUNMAN in 1901 on that reference I gave!
Henry 1867 Mary 1868 Henry 1890 Mary K 1897 Nora 1898
The same in 1891 on Ancestry they are SUNMAN Henry 1868 Mary 1868 Henry 1889

Keyboard86

I use Findmypast, and I have double checked and they are definitely not on their transcript of the 1901 census. So, I guess I will have to pop over to Ancestry to get a print out then. Annoying, as I have credits on findmypast only.

[Pentangle67]

Do you know how to use the references?   

No 

[JenB]

I use Findmypast, and I have double checked and they are definitely not on their transcript of the 1901 census.

Search for SIMMAN in Hull 

There is a reference search on findmypast - simply click on it and use the numbers keyboard has given you.

They are definitely there in 1901.

[keyboard86]

Yes my fault, I transcribed incorrectly as SINMAN Not SIMMAN in 1901 !!

Keyboard86

[JenB]

The handwriting on the 1901 is terrible - it could be transcribed in quite a few different ways 

[Pentangle67]

I use Findmypast, and I have double checked and they are definitely not on their transcript of the 1901 census.

Search for SIMMAN in Hull 

There is a reference search on findmypast - simply click on it and use the numbers keyboard has given you.

They are definitely there in 1901.

Yes, found them    Mystery solved.. thank you Keyboard, Jen and silvery for helping me out. Very much appreciated.