Author Topic: looking for a death  (Read 1496 times)

Offline SnowyMate

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 13
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
looking for a death
« on: Monday 01 August 11 05:18 BST (UK) »
G’day Fellas

I’m looking for a little help again. I’m trying to find the deaths or anything related to a John Pettit B. 1759 Castle Camps and his wife Mary Pettit. They were married in Burwell but all their children were born in Castle Camps. Their last being twins, Lydia and Staphen B. 1803. After this I can find nothing of John and Mary. I would love to know when and where they died. If anyone has any kind of hint for me it would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Offline bedfordshire boy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,243
    • View Profile
Re: looking for a death
« Reply #1 on: Monday 01 August 11 05:49 BST (UK) »
Stephen, infant, buried 3 Oct 1802 at Castle Camps. Lydia (Mary in BT) infant buried 2 Jan 1803.

Thereafter there's no John or Mary burial in Castle Camps that fits

Hang about though! If John was B 1794 the last of his children couldn't have been born in 1803. Were they still alive in any census?

David
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Beds:   Cople: Luke/Spencer
            Everton: Hale
            Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey/Rook
            Potton:  Merrill
            Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey/Rook
            Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt
Hunts:   Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock
            Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn         
Cambs: Bourn: Bowd
            Eltisley: Medlock
            Graveley: Ford/Revell

Offline SnowyMate

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 13
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: looking for a death
« Reply #2 on: Monday 01 August 11 06:38 BST (UK) »
LoL very true, he couldn't have been born then, I was looking at his son Johns birth when I typed that. I will fix that in my original post.

Thank you for pointing that out.