Hi sandy,
No I'm not offended. Any help at this stage is appreciated.
I think I can safely rule out the Bates connection, it was a long shot and from further research it is very unlikely. The Ball (which can be confused with Bale, particularly the way in which it is written in the old documents), is a real possibility, I think.
All I have that is concrete on this family is the birth of Thomas Bales in Wellingborough in 1803 to Thomas and Susannah. This Thomas was a convict and was sent to Australia in 1822 and is my husbands direct relative. On his death certificate it lists parents as Thomas and Susannah with his fathers occupation as a soldier. Now all this, appart from the soldier thing, appears to be correct.
You then found Susannah Toby (Bale) birth in Wellingborough, so her birth is known, and this is basically all I have.
From searching the national archives I found a removal to order for a Thomas Bale, Susannah and 3 children from Denford to Eaton Socon in 1818. This I am fairly sure is them. Now while the name appears to have a change here to Ball it fits with the birth of the 2 younger children as an Ann Ball was baptised in Denford by Thomas and Susanna in 1817 and a John Ball from all thie census is listed as being born in Denford at the same time as well. This is helped by the fact that these Ball children are then found in the census's in Eaton Socon where they married and then the 2 girls died.
If this is correct then the parents might well be Bedfordshire too, but I have found no trace so far, under Bale or Ball.
So thats the story and all I have.Hope this all makes scense!!
Kind regards,
Kristy