Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: sister in kent 1940  (Read 3699 times)

Offline captainbonius

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 71
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: sister in kent 1940
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 29 March 11 12:13 BST (UK) »
have resized picture is this any better
     kind regards captainbonius

Offline Niksmum

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,979
  • Bermuda 2014
    • View Profile
Re: sister in kent 1940
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 29 March 11 16:20 BST (UK) »
my try

Irene
Buckinghamshire-Babbs<br />Somerset-Smith<br />Woolwich-Elliott<br />London-Elliott, Hare,Baker

Restorers please do NOT use any restores done by me without my permission

Offline Niksmum

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,979
  • Bermuda 2014
    • View Profile
Re: sister in kent 1940
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 29 March 11 16:22 BST (UK) »
one  a bit more sharper

Irene
Buckinghamshire-Babbs<br />Somerset-Smith<br />Woolwich-Elliott<br />London-Elliott, Hare,Baker

Restorers please do NOT use any restores done by me without my permission

Offline D_

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 510
    • View Profile
Re: sister in kent 1940
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 29 March 11 23:00 BST (UK) »
Hi David, :)

Interestingly enough this subject was discussed elsewhere this morning - according to me the above picture was scanned at 300 dpi.


Quote

Hi Pels,  I can only go with the info I had at the time of restore i.e showing 96dpi.  Apologies Captain bonius for the technical blah blah that ensued my comment.

Cheers, David.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Pels.

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 10,230
    • View Profile
Re: sister in kent 1940
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 29 March 11 23:38 BST (UK) »



Quote from: DCF_2009 on Tuesday 29 March 11 23:00 BST (UK)

Hi Pels,  I can only go with the info I had at the time of restore i.e showing 96dpi.  Apologies Captain bonius for the technical blah blah that ensued my comment.

Cheers, David.

The technical 'blah blah' is how we learn to be better at what we try to do.

If it's of benefit to the poster, I don't think captainbonius will object in the slightest. I'm sure your apology will be appreciated !  :) :)

Lovely restores Irene - I've been on with this all day and can't do it.
Thanks for coming to our help George. Hope you feel better tomorrow Rachel ! xx

Kind regards,

Pels.
.


Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline saddles

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,826
    • View Profile
Re: sister in kent 1940
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday 30 March 11 02:16 BST (UK) »
Hi........Another to add to the list.

Carolyn  :)
Townson - Cartmel                      O'Malley - Askeaton, Ireland
Sadler - Dymock & Salford           Tomlinson - St Peters, Leeds
Wilkinson - Salford                      Chant - Sherbourne, Dorset
Garner - Pendleton

Offline Rachels

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,583
    • View Profile
Re: sister in kent 1940
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday 30 March 11 08:41 BST (UK) »
Quote from: Pels. on Tuesday 29 March 11 23:38 BST (UK)



Quote from: DCF_2009 on Tuesday 29 March 11 23:00 BST (UK)

Hi Pels,  I can only go with the info I had at the time of restore i.e showing 96dpi.  Apologies Captain bonius for the technical blah blah that ensued my comment.

Cheers, David.

The technical 'blah blah' is how we learn to be better at what we try to do.

If it's of benefit to the poster, I don't think captainbonius will object in the slightest. I'm sure your apology will be appreciated !  :) :)

Lovely restores Irene - I've been on with this all day and can't do it.
Thanks for coming to our help George. Hope you feel better tomorrow Rachel ! xx

Kind regards,

Pels.

At the risk of having stuff thrown at me and out of curiosity, I'm posting what my computer says about the 2nd scan

As you can see, this is smaller   :-\


Rachel
FOR RESTORATIONS PLEASE SCAN AT 300-600 
Please do NOT use my restores without permission, unless you're the owner of the photo.  Some of my restores are on flickr.com ~ rachel sc

my computer is an iMac

BANCE, BALLINGER, CHEES(E)MAN, CONNOR, COOK, COX, CRUTCHLEY,
DAWSON, FLYNN, FOLWELL, FORGAN, FORREST, HARRIS, KING, LOOKER,
MIDGLEY, OATES, ROE, SIM(M)S, WHITTINGTON

Offline Rachels

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,583
    • View Profile
Re: sister in kent 1940
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday 30 March 11 08:50 BST (UK) »
here's a previous thread worth reading

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,515336.0.html

and Caz' scanning tutorial

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,198165.0.html

Rachel (incapacitated)      :(
FOR RESTORATIONS PLEASE SCAN AT 300-600 
Please do NOT use my restores without permission, unless you're the owner of the photo.  Some of my restores are on flickr.com ~ rachel sc

my computer is an iMac

BANCE, BALLINGER, CHEES(E)MAN, CONNOR, COOK, COX, CRUTCHLEY,
DAWSON, FLYNN, FOLWELL, FORGAN, FORREST, HARRIS, KING, LOOKER,
MIDGLEY, OATES, ROE, SIM(M)S, WHITTINGTON

Offline D_

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 510
    • View Profile
Re: sister in kent 1940
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday 30 March 11 11:08 BST (UK) »
The technical 'blah blah' is how we learn to be better at what we try to do.

If it's of benefit to the poster, I don't think captainbonius will object in the slightest. I'm sure your apology will be appreciated !  :) :)


Thanks for that Pels.  I'm sure my apology will be appreciated.  If the technical blah blah  (don't be offended!! not meant to be offensive) is of benefit to the poster then fair enough.  Personally speaking I know that I wouldn't like my post for a restore to be taken up with technical know how but instead if necessary a link to a technical forum.

David.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Pages: 1 [2]