Author Topic: "Heir Hunters" TV program #2  (Read 19634 times)

Offline patrish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,816
  • Winter Wonderland
    • View Profile
Re: "Heir Hunters" TV program #2
« Reply #36 on: Friday 25 March 11 16:21 GMT (UK) »
I love the programme and hope that we get many more episodes in the future... so much better than the load of old rubbish that is currently on.
this information is Crown Copyright. from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk   London Hall, Thurston Stanley, Phillips, Ayrton, White, Morrish, Smith.    West Ham/Barking Saint,Briggs,   Essex  Barker,   Hampshire  Kill, Kent Spong,   U.S.A Earp, Scotland/Cumbria Templeton, Devon Morrish, Chudley

Offline Nick29

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,273
    • View Profile
Re: "Heir Hunters" TV program #2
« Reply #37 on: Friday 25 March 11 16:34 GMT (UK) »
The only thing that I don't like about the programme is that they usually do two cases simultaneously on the programme, and my feeble male brain often gets confused between the two cases (often aided by a glass or two of red wine, when I'm watching the programme in the evening !)  :)
RIP 1949-10th January 2013

Best Wishes,  Nick.

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline patrish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,816
  • Winter Wonderland
    • View Profile
Re: "Heir Hunters" TV program #2
« Reply #38 on: Friday 25 March 11 16:49 GMT (UK) »
Have you noticed that so many programmes now do this, it drives me mad as well.
this information is Crown Copyright. from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk   London Hall, Thurston Stanley, Phillips, Ayrton, White, Morrish, Smith.    West Ham/Barking Saint,Briggs,   Essex  Barker,   Hampshire  Kill, Kent Spong,   U.S.A Earp, Scotland/Cumbria Templeton, Devon Morrish, Chudley

Offline danuslave

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,882
  • My fashion sense isn't any better now!
    • View Profile
Re: "Heir Hunters" TV program #2
« Reply #39 on: Friday 25 March 11 17:14 GMT (UK) »
Well they do keep recapping everything that's gone before!!
MOXHAM/MOXAM - Wiltshire & Surrey
SKEATS - Surrey
BRETT - Kent & County Durham
and
SWINBANK - anywhere

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Riojatinto

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 45
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: "Heir Hunters" TV program #2
« Reply #40 on: Friday 25 March 11 17:42 GMT (UK) »
A copy of a will is just that a copy.  It is not valid as an original will and usually no official body (i.e. courts for probate/letters of administration) would accept a copy as being valid.  Most people keep the original will in a strong box at the bank or leave it with their solicitor who will have a document room which is usually fire proof.  They only have a copy themselves usually so they can remember what they put in the will and so that the family actually know that a will exists when they are searching through the deceasedīs papers etc.  Having an original will at home is dangerous in that it could be destroyed, thrown out accidentally or worse (as has happened in some cases) when someone who does not inherit as they thought they should destroys the will (since they may be better off under the intestacy rules).

A copy of a will would probably only be accepted by the courts etc if there was a genuine cast iron reason why the original could not be produced i.e. solicitors office destroyed in bomb blast etc...then they might accept a copy.


Offline davidft

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: "Heir Hunters" TV program #2
« Reply #41 on: Friday 25 March 11 18:14 GMT (UK) »
It is possible to have two originals of a will ie the will is produced twice and each is signed and witnessed by the same people at the same time.

This is what people should do if they want their will at home and with the Solicitor - they should not make copies eg by photocopying.

In this case they are not copies - both are originals, and legal.
James Stott c1775-1850. James was born in Yorkshire but where? He was a stonemason and married Elizabeth Archer (nee Nicholson) in 1794 at Ripon. They lived thereafter in Masham. If anyone has any suggestions or leads as to his birthplace I would be interested to know. I have searched for it for years without success. Thank you.

Offline sandiep

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,585
    • View Profile
Re: "Heir Hunters" TV program #2
« Reply #42 on: Friday 25 March 11 19:01 GMT (UK) »
still on wills......todays programme had another case of a will not being accepted because "it wasnt correctly made"  but they didnt explain what was incorrect........wish they would finish telling you all facts............I love the programme but do find it a bit frustrating sometimes
Pender, Raphael,Lambert,Digby,Stent,
Dowell,cornish,mulley,Death,Rosier,
East End,Suffolk,Essex,Cornwall,Devon,London,  middlesex, hertfordshire                                      Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Alan b

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
    • View Profile
Re: "Heir Hunters" TV program #2
« Reply #43 on: Friday 25 March 11 20:42 GMT (UK) »
Well they do keep recapping everything that's gone before!!

Probably for when it is shown on other channels with adverts the program is then stretched out to 60 minutes long and to keep the Nick29's (sorry couldn't help myself!) in the loop with what the story is especially as each episode contains two.

I do wonder if they have had much luck with the request for help segments in each episode.
Bloomfield, Knights, Whitmore, Warner (Suffolk)
Hamlin (London, Yorkshire, Scotland, Suffolk)
Mattocks, Newick, Nutter, (Kent)
Mattocks (Staffs)

Offline Riojatinto

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 45
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: "Heir Hunters" TV program #2
« Reply #44 on: Saturday 26 March 11 09:18 GMT (UK) »
A will could be invalid for several reasons but basicially it has to be signed and dated by the testator in front of TWO witnesses who must also sign the will as evidence that they have seen the testator execute the will.  Legally, the witnesses do not have to know the contents of the will.  All they are witnessing is the signature of the Testator to the document.