Hello all
I know we often have queries here about whether people should only research their direct lines, or go off on tangents to cover less direct branches of the tree.
However, I have now found two very interesting connections which would never have emerged unless I'd followed up the sidelines fully.
My great great great grandfather was illegitimate, and his mother didn't marry until he was about 8, and he was 10 when she had more children (or at least the ones I know about).
So I busily followed through my direct line for some time, taking no note of these half siblings. Quite honestly, there was enough to do tracking down all my greatx3 grandfather's children. If I thought anything, I sort of believed that, being illegitimate, he wasn't part of a family, so to speak.
But I've now discovered, firstly, that one of my greatx3 grandfather's children married her cousin - they share the same grandmother - this came out from following up the half siblings and their marriages.
And, secondly, I've now discovered something else - pause, whilst I think how to describe this to you

- the widower of one of these half siblings married his first wife's cousin (his mother-in-law's neice).
So this tells me a lot about my greatx3 grandfather and his connection with his mother's new family, and how close they all were in Kent in the 19th century. They didn't live far from each other, but not in the same village, and also moved from census to census.
So I'm now thinking of creating a spreadsheet with the various people and their locations in the various censuses, because I think I may be able to find some more connections in where they lived
I bet I'm not alone in fiddling with my Ancestry tree and thinking that some of the addresses on the censuses ring a bell with me, and that they link with other parts of the tree........