May I butt in please, and perhaps following from giblet's post and Clancam37's reply
clancam have you read the replies on your other threads as yet? Just you havent acknowleged them and there could be some useful information in them.
and reply
Hi giblet,
My apologies if I did not thank you for your reply. As "courtesy" is almost non-existent these days I do try to send notes of apprecation for all replies. My hyperlink facility often locks-up my computer, and need to ctrl-alt-delete to rectify. Will be more responsible in future.
Clancam37, may I please mention that on several of your current threads you have missed answering some questions that may have helped you with your John BOUCHER and his wife, Catherine MCDONNEL (and variations). I have contributed to some of those threads, and of course, I am curious as to if the info I posted has been of use . As you have not yet acknowledged those contributions, I and others reading the thread have no way of telling if YOU have read the info and if that info has been of help to you.
On one of your current threads, I referred back to comments you made less than four months ago on a thread that Cheran commenced. You wrote “I’d be happy to look up these names for you as I regularly visit the Hobart City Archives twice weekly for a Genealogist friend……. Quite voluntary”
Here’s a live link to one of those current threads:
MCDONNELL 63rd Regiment
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=684542.0 May I add, that I find that if the poster acknowledges my posts, then in turn I am encouraged to continue to strive to help them. I am sure that there are many RChatters who like me, simply like to know whether the information has been useful (or not). So, I find the courtesy of an acknowledgement of the contribution serves to indicate that is useful or not, and that courtesy of course extends not just to the person who searched for the info, but to others, now or in the future, as RChat threads are in the public forum and so very easily found via google searchings. Of course, it is best to acknowledge the contributions on the thread rather than by PM, as not only does it save you typing many thank you notes, but everyone can see that the OP is courteous, and appreciative of the efforts our fellow RChatters made.
Clancam37, may I commend you for your twice weekly visits to Hobart City Archives. May I please ask for you to find the spare moments and go back over your earlier threads and when you have the moments, please comment as to if the info I and others posted there has been helpful or otherwise. I am not looking for notes of appreciation, I am simply wanting to know if the info I am providing is of value to advancing each particular family history quest. The courtesy surely is in your willingness to provide that acknowledgement, and my willingness to learn where my own resources are less than adequate.
ADD
Vic BDM John BOUCHER, aged 19, registered in 1853, rego number #749.
Cheers, JM