Author Topic: Soundex  (Read 2000 times)

Offline BigSlick

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 223
  • Much Troubled and Misunderstood
    • View Profile
Soundex
« on: Monday 07 March 11 08:30 GMT (UK) »
Anyone able to define and explain what Soundex is?
The sirnames Chester and Lane

Offline aghadowey

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 52,585
    • View Profile
Re: Soundex
« Reply #1 on: Monday 07 March 11 08:55 GMT (UK) »
There are lots of explanations online- just google "soundex". Here's one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soundex
Away sorting out DNA matches... I may be gone for some time many years!

Offline BigSlick

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 223
  • Much Troubled and Misunderstood
    • View Profile
Re: Soundex
« Reply #2 on: Monday 07 March 11 09:24 GMT (UK) »
Thanks,
Sounds like it is the database equivalent of voice recognition  :D

The sirnames Chester and Lane

Offline Billyblue

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,066
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Soundex
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 08 March 11 01:07 GMT (UK) »
That's a very apt comparison, BigSlick.
The LDS sites use it a lot, which sometimes mean it throws up some weird suggestions!
Handy though for those times when a surname could be spelt three different ways in the one document, and by the same person!.
Dawn M
Denys (France); Rossier/Rousseau (Switzerland); Montgomery (Antrim, IRL & North Sydney NSW);  Finn (Co.Carlow, IRL & NSW); Wilson (Leicestershire & NSW); Blue (Sydney NSW); Fisher & Barrago & Harrington(all Tipperary, IRL)


Offline mlrfn448

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
    • View Profile
Re: Soundex
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 08 March 11 11:27 GMT (UK) »
It is based on similar sounding consonants, the idea being that when searching for a name, then minor variations in spelling would be insignificant, and all similar names would be found.
However, the start letter must be correct.

The point being that the minister would write what he heard in the register, but would not necessarily know the spelling.

I use it in my database, having downloaded some free soundex software from the internet.

Regards

Offline suelaw1954

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
  • Sue, Feb 1955. So cute, what went wrong?
    • View Profile
Re: Soundex
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday 05 July 11 02:24 BST (UK) »
You need to be a bit careful with computer generated soundex codes. The rules are very simplistic and don't recognise things like vowel modifiers (e.g. "r" after "o" before a consonant) leading to some weird results.

My mother's surname has 2 common spellings: Spall or Sporle. Pronounciation is identical but the automatically generated code for Spall is S140 while the code for Sporle is S164 and there is no overlap in the resulting name lists. This means I always have to do 2 searches in a database with soundex.

The rules seem to be fairly simple, so I aim to do my coding by hand and commonsense in future.

Sue :-\
Common(s) - Sussex, London, Northumberland
Spall - London, Suffolk (Debenham, Cretingham)
Goddard - Sussex (Brighton, Newtimber, Edburton)
Piller - London, Norfolk
Shadbolt - Herts (Codicote, Datchworth)
Young - Sussex (Brighton)
Rose - Army, London
Beckwith - London, Norfolk