Author Topic: Help DATING photos, please - COMPLETED  (Read 4501 times)

Offline chinakay

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,553
  • Our housegoof
    • View Profile
Re: Help DATING photos, please
« Reply #18 on: Monday 14 February 11 15:25 GMT (UK) »
Well Jim...

Point #1. Your post "crossed" mine about 15 hours late. You really should be a little more on the ball.

Point #2. I have seen cherubs on 1900s cardstock.

Point #3. If the start of my date range is 1898, and the end of yours is 1899, I fail to see how you could possibly be disagreeable disagree with my estimate.

Point #4. Happy Valentine's Day :-* :-* :-* ;D ;D ;D
Moore/Paterson~Montreal
Moore/Addison~New Brunswick
Jubb/Kerr~Mirfield~Halifax~Moffatt
Williams~Dolwyddelan

King~Bedfordshire~Hull
Jenkins~Somerset
Sellers~Hull

Offline jim1

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,843
  • ain't life grand
    • View Profile
Re: Help DATING photos, please
« Reply #19 on: Monday 14 February 11 15:44 GMT (UK) »
I don't think this bodice is early 1900's  & she's still relatively young so I would expect to see her in something a bit more up to date,also the girl is wearing a variation from around 1896 & I can't see a girl of this age wearing this early 1900's either...oh the embarrassment.So I wouldn't put it any later than your starting date either.
& happy Valentine's Day to you.

jim
Warks:Ashford;Cadby;Clarke;Clifford;Cooke Copage;Easthope;
Edmonds;Felton;Colledge;Lutwyche;Mander(s);May;Poole;Withers.
Staffs.Edmonds;Addison;Duffield;Webb;Fisher;Archer
Salop:Easthope,Eddowes,Hoorde,Oteley,Vernon,Talbot,De Neville.
Notts.Clarke;Redfearne;Treece.
Som.May;Perriman;Cox
India Kane;Felton;Cadby
London.Haysom.
Lancs.Gay.
Worcs.Coley;Mander;Sawyer.
Kings of Wessex & Scotland
Census information is Crown copyright,from
www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Offline Wooler57

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 11
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Help DATING photos, please - COMPLETED
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday 16 February 11 20:47 GMT (UK) »
Jim, China.  Thanks for all of your really valuable discussions and conclusions.  I’ve been doing a bit of detective work based on my family tree and the dates you have recommended for these photos.

Looking at the ages of the children, and the dates of the photos, it would be a real stretch to try to get them to fit my great-grandparents, George & Janet.  The family photo in particular, doesn’t fit with the ages of the children.

However, George’s older brother, William Wightman and his family fit the dates perfectly.  They had 5 children, with the youngest being born in 1897.  If the family photo is 1896, the other 4 children would be aged 13, 11 (girl), 7 and 5.  The parents would be 42 (William) and 38 (Jemima).

In the 1891 & 1901 census, they are living just around the corner from the Brighton Grove studio where the photo was taken.

William and my great-grandfather set up their own bootmakers shop, so must have been fairly close.  I imagine that William and his wife had portraits made when they married in 1882 and probably gave a set to my great-grandparents – which is how I’ve got the paintings now.

It’s disappointing to realise that the portraits are not my great-grandparents, but it’s good to be able to put some names to the photos with a certain degree of confidence.  Thanks once again for your great input,

Ian