Author Topic: Dead end  (Read 3503 times)

Offline greenfinch99

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Re: Dead end
« Reply #9 on: Monday 17 January 11 19:26 GMT (UK) »
You have all been so kind, and I really do appreciate your help.
One question, would I be able to see the bapt. parish records at the records office in Winchester rather than Southampton as it would be easier for me to get there?  It has given me at least some directions to explore.
I have never been able to match those 3 different families up, although I have researched them, and I have never found a Stephen born to any of them, this has given me a little more hope.
Thanks so much
Sue

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,905
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Dead end
« Reply #10 on: Monday 17 January 11 21:13 GMT (UK) »
Hi Sue

Winchester local Studies & archives

http://www3.hants.gov.uk/archives

Parish registers covered link

 http://www3.hants.gov.uk/archives/hals-collections/hals-parish-registers.htm


Enter Stephen Cole or Coles in the search engine and
if you can get to Winchester you can view the originals.Poor Law, overseer land tax,
 Tithes Terriers - well alsorts

http://www3.hants.gov.uk/archives/catalog.htm

If you can't go to Winchester? you could write, Email or phone for of the copy
 of the Richard Cole marriage to Sarah 1738 the parish Entry.
With this being a known date (They do need to search and can go straight to it )
 they will only charge post and copy charge (about £2 tops) or you send a cheque
 with a SAE at agreed price.

Basingstoke or Guildford may also have the marriage on micro film.

As you will know pre 1837 GRO BMDs and 1841 census and No parent on parish marriages
its a different ball game and you can never be 100 % unless Wills and other supporting
 doc's come to light

What we do is use logic and Epistemology to work it out!
Binsted was Stephen marriage place and Richard the only marriage and family that fit Binsted those
 years and Elimination of other Stephen bapt and marriages of said years.

Baptisms and birth can be years apart and they had private baptisms also as I said the old PR's can be
unreadable even moth/mouse/ wear eaten holes in them that far back.

I have little doubt!! I think ! Richard was Stephen father and the other baptism 1737 Stephen of Stoke Charity was the Romsey marriage in 1760's

MI's and grave stones in village graveyards in gruops of family surnames names and the epitath are the best source telling a true picture.


Dave from Yorkshire
In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,905
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Dead end
« Reply #11 on: Monday 17 January 11 21:40 GMT (UK) »
Send Little Nell (Moderator)a personal message (PM)as she hs knowledge of Binsted burials

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,70085.0.html
In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,905
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Dead end
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 18 January 11 01:06 GMT (UK) »
Cole family 1679-c1900 includes deeds of properties in Crondall and Odiham, north of Atlton


50M63
 Lamb, Brooks and Bullock of Odiham, solicitors
 

Winchester Archives
In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth


Offline greenfinch99

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Re: Dead end
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 18 January 11 21:38 GMT (UK) »
Goodness, where on earth do you look to find all this information, I can't thank you enough and am planning a visit in the not to distant future to Winchester to see if I can find copies of this information you have so kindly told me about. 
I am still trying to find any record 'online' of a son born to Richard and Sarah called Stephen 1740'ish, it would make more sense that these are his parents, timeline is right and the area is right, just need to find something to confirm it.
Thanks for your help.
Sue