Author Topic: Smith surname - Too Hard!!  (Read 7187 times)

Offline toni*

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,549
    • View Profile
Re: Smith surname - Too Hard!!
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 14 November 10 18:08 GMT (UK) »
sorry to be pedantic  but how old was William when he married ?
Holman & Vinton- Cornwall, Wojciechowskyj & Hussak- Bukowiec & Zahutyn, Bentley & Richards- Leicester, Taylor-Kent/Sussex  Punnett-Sussex,  Bear/e- Monkleigh Gazey-Warwicks

UK Census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchive

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: Smith surname - Too Hard!!
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 14 November 10 18:10 GMT (UK) »
Yes, with the surname Agnew being considerably less common than either Smith or Taylor, in these circumstances I would research her first, you never know what this line may lead to. Remember too, that though Smith is the commonest surname in the UK, there are regional variations in the level of incidence, in parts of Northern England it is substituted by Wright. which has a similar meaning, so who knows, researching Smith might be feasible in the North east.
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)

Offline kellysmith1976

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 227
  • Loads of love Kelly
    • View Profile
Re: Smith surname - Too Hard!!
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 14 November 10 18:12 GMT (UK) »
No prob, if you can help , I dont mind... Sorry i didnt think to put it earlier...

He was 32yrs... So maybe that wasnt him on the 1901 census?
ELLMER - Yorkshire to Strood, Kent
ROGERS - Rochester, Kent
CARDER - Rye to Rochester, Kent
KEMP - Hawkhurst - Rochester, Kent
THOMAS - Chatham, Kent
RHODES - Rye
WOOLLEY - Milton to Rochester
STANLEY - Whitechapel
LOUGHAN - Ireland
BURNET - Essex
SWEATMAN - Kent
BECK - Chatham
BLACK - Rochester
WICKER - Strood
KING - Middlesex - Strood
CROUCH - Headcorn
HICKMOTT - Lamberhurst
BATES - Strood
WELFARE - Sussex - Strood

Offline toni*

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,549
    • View Profile
Re: Smith surname - Too Hard!!
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 14 November 10 18:23 GMT (UK) »
hmmmm so he was 32 in 1934 and 62 in 1961
Holman & Vinton- Cornwall, Wojciechowskyj & Hussak- Bukowiec & Zahutyn, Bentley & Richards- Leicester, Taylor-Kent/Sussex  Punnett-Sussex,  Bear/e- Monkleigh Gazey-Warwicks

UK Census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchive


Offline kellysmith1976

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 227
  • Loads of love Kelly
    • View Profile
Re: Smith surname - Too Hard!!
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 14 November 10 18:31 GMT (UK) »
He was 62, In 1962... And 32 in 1934...

Well i have just searched through 1911, and I can only find a handful of William Smiths with a father called Alexander, Born around the same time, but im still leaning towards Alexander & Rachel being the parents... Bt maybe thats because they were the first ones i found...

I have asked my husband to try and remember any details, and it seems that they never knew of any other SMiths..
My Husbands dad was called Malcolm, He had siblings Roy, Gordon, Sheila, Robin, Carole, Barry, Raymond....
They are all either passed away or unknown now...
ELLMER - Yorkshire to Strood, Kent
ROGERS - Rochester, Kent
CARDER - Rye to Rochester, Kent
KEMP - Hawkhurst - Rochester, Kent
THOMAS - Chatham, Kent
RHODES - Rye
WOOLLEY - Milton to Rochester
STANLEY - Whitechapel
LOUGHAN - Ireland
BURNET - Essex
SWEATMAN - Kent
BECK - Chatham
BLACK - Rochester
WICKER - Strood
KING - Middlesex - Strood
CROUCH - Headcorn
HICKMOTT - Lamberhurst
BATES - Strood
WELFARE - Sussex - Strood

Offline genjen

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,439
    • View Profile
Re: Smith surname - Too Hard!!
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 14 November 10 18:32 GMT (UK) »
So whoever gave the information on his age wasn't entirely accurate! Well ther's a surprise. The Smiths seem to be so good at this. ::)

If only my own John Smith had known when he was born, my family history would be so much easier to research!

I'd be more inclined to believe the 1934 information as, presumably, he gave that himself, whereas his age on his death certificate would be given by someone who might well have been guessing.
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

ESS: Howe French Cant Annis Noakes Turner Marshall Makerow Duck Spurden Harmony
SCT: Howe Shaw Raitt Milne Forsyth Birnie Crichton Duncan McBeath Daniel Hay Robertson Jaffrey Smith McDonald Alexander Craighead
NRY: Bushby Smith Bland Iley Cunion Kendrew Thornbury Favell Lonsdale Crossland Rudd Pratt Gibson
WES; Dickenson Jackson Ewbank Waller
STS: White
SRY: Knight
DUR: Smith Littlefair
HAM: Williams Grose Lush Venson

Offline silvery

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,779
  • information Crown Copyright, from www.nation
    • View Profile
Re: Smith surname - Too Hard!!
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 14 November 10 19:05 GMT (UK) »
Are there any aunts/uncles (either side) that may have a bit more?   Was he in the army?   Gotta be some snippet ........surely....... anything 
"This information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk"

Offline AngelaR

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,034
    • View Profile
Re: Smith surname - Too Hard!!
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 14 November 10 19:11 GMT (UK) »
Army's a good one Silvery - at that age he could (just) have been in either or both of WW1 and WW2.

I was wondering about his occupation? Some employers kept and still keep employee service records....
Any census information included in this post is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Especially looking for - Sealey, Rogers, Cannings, Box, Sheppard in Wiltshire; Virgin, Slade, Abbott, Saint, Harper, Silverthorn in Somerset; and Virgin, Tarr, Beer in Devon

And most especially the origins of William Cannings,  a Baptist, born abt 1791 in Broughton Gifford, Wiltshire

Offline toni*

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,549
    • View Profile
Re: Smith surname - Too Hard!!
« Reply #17 on: Sunday 14 November 10 19:39 GMT (UK) »
i totally agree with Jen re his age as he was the one to give it in 1934 but could he have made himself younger than he was 
Holman & Vinton- Cornwall, Wojciechowskyj & Hussak- Bukowiec & Zahutyn, Bentley & Richards- Leicester, Taylor-Kent/Sussex  Punnett-Sussex,  Bear/e- Monkleigh Gazey-Warwicks

UK Census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchive