Author Topic: National Archives under threat?  (Read 10579 times)

Offline Nick29

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,273
    • View Profile
Re: National Archives under threat?
« Reply #45 on: Tuesday 05 October 10 15:50 BST (UK) »
I suppose what makes me uncomfortable is that information such as the National Archives is garnered using public (ie taxpayers') money, so in theory we own it. 

Hmmm...... Britain's gold reserves is garnered using taxpayer's money too, but I suspect that a letter to the Chancellor asking for our share would meet deaf ears !   ;D
RIP 1949-10th January 2013

Best Wishes,  Nick.

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: National Archives under threat?
« Reply #46 on: Tuesday 05 October 10 18:01 BST (UK) »
I suppose what makes me uncomfortable is that information such as the National Archives is garnered using public (ie taxpayers') money, so in theory we own it. 

Hmmm...... Britain's gold reserves is garnered using taxpayer's money too, but I suspect that a letter to the Chancellor asking for our share would meet deaf ears !   ;D

That is unless you are a banker, one of the, to quote a Lib-Dem for once instead of Marx or Keynes, "spivs and gamblers" who got us into this mess.
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)

Offline akanex2

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Re: National Archives under threat?
« Reply #47 on: Thursday 14 October 10 12:59 BST (UK) »
Short answer - No ;D

"The National Archives
Retain - Retain on grounds of performing a technical function which should remain independent from Government"

[From list of Quangos released this morning]

Offline Nick29

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,273
    • View Profile
Re: National Archives under threat?
« Reply #48 on: Thursday 14 October 10 13:22 BST (UK) »
Excellent news  :)
RIP 1949-10th January 2013

Best Wishes,  Nick.

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,932
    • View Profile
Re: National Archives under threat?
« Reply #49 on: Thursday 14 October 10 14:50 BST (UK) »
Phewwwwwwww

That is good news!

Kerry  :D
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: National Archives under threat?
« Reply #50 on: Thursday 14 October 10 17:51 BST (UK) »
But many useful things, e.g. National Audit Office are to be scrapped, and audits carried out by "independent accountants" talk about foxes guarding hen houses!
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)

Offline Greensleeves

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,505
    • View Profile
Re: National Archives under threat?
« Reply #51 on: Thursday 14 October 10 20:22 BST (UK) »
Yes, I am glad the National Archives are okay for the time being, but agree with Roger that some of the reasoning regarding other bodies is somewhat questionable.

GS
Suffolk: Pearl(e),  Garnham, Southgate, Blo(o)mfield,Grimwood/Grimwade,Josselyn/Gosling
Durham/Yorkshire: Sedgwick/Sidgwick, Shadforth
Ireland: Davis
Norway: Torreson/Torsen/Torrison
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline akanex2

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Re: National Archives under threat?
« Reply #52 on: Thursday 14 October 10 23:08 BST (UK) »
But many useful things, e.g. National Audit Office are to be scrapped

Just to clarify - it is the "Audit Commission" which has been scrapped, NOT the National Audit Office (NAO).  The Commission dealt with Local Authority and NHS matters in England and Wales and their regulatory function will be taken over by the NAO, thereby actually increasing the oversight to be exercised by the National Audit Office which already deals with national government matters.

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: National Archives under threat?
« Reply #53 on: Friday 15 October 10 18:05 BST (UK) »
But the actual audits will be carried out by the private sector, people who audit the accounts of traders etc. who have transactions with local authorities, effectively therefore scrutinising their own clients' accounts, hence my comment about foxes and keys to henhouses.
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)