Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic: Re: Jane Langston  (Read 7677 times)

Offline Daisypetal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,480
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Langston
« Reply #27 on: Saturday 24 March 18 16:31 GMT (UK) »

I noticed that the convict indent you posted for Jane mentions Leeds underneath CoSligo but I'm not sure what it means ??? 

"First ap in Leeds"  ?

All Census Data included in this post is Crown Copyright (see: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk)

Offline matthewj64

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,414
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Langston
« Reply #28 on: Saturday 24 March 18 18:24 GMT (UK) »
Quote from: Daisypetal on Saturday 24 March 18 16:31 GMT (UK)

I noticed that the convict indent you posted for Jane mentions Leeds underneath CoSligo but I'm not sure what it means ??? 

"First ap in Leeds"  ?

Looking at other entries its bro(ugh)t up in

M

Offline thelly

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Jane Langston
« Reply #29 on: Sunday 25 March 18 05:48 BST (UK) »
Hi all,
First of all thank you for your help, I will look up the web pages you have sent and see what is there, she could be the sister of Frederick B Langston, according to several records I have, she was born either 1815/16, and if Frederick was born in 1816, it is very possible they were related, and perhaps when she was convicted she said she was Irish, as her parents were.
I'm sorry I don't know what the Leeds means.
Regards,
Thelly
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]