Author Topic: The Diary of Nathaniel Bryceson (Part 6)  (Read 52659 times)

Offline Siamese Girl

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,246
    • View Profile
Re: The Diary of Nathaniel Bryceson (Part 6)
« Reply #261 on: Thursday 09 September 10 07:39 BST (UK) »
No entries for the 9th and 10th of September which is very disappointing. I wonder if Nathaniel is either too busy to write in his diary, or nothing has happened that he feels is worth writing about OR he just can't be bothered ...  :)

I have days like that - my diary is littered with entries which read "nuffin much"

Carole
CHILD Glos/London, BONUS London, DIMSDALE London, HODD and TUTT Sussex,  BONNER and PATTEN Essex, BOWLER and HOLLIER Oxfordshire, HUGH Lincolnshire, LEEDOM all.

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,276
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Diary of Nathaniel Bryceson (Part 6)
« Reply #262 on: Thursday 09 September 10 11:32 BST (UK) »
No entries for the 9th and 10th of September which is very disappointing. I wonder if Nathaniel is either too busy to write in his diary, or nothing has happened that he feels is worth writing about OR he just can't be bothered ...  :)

I have days like that - my diary is littered with entries which read "nuffin much"

Carole

 ;D

Offline Mongibello

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 52
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Diary of Nathaniel Bryceson (Part 6)
« Reply #263 on: Thursday 09 September 10 20:02 BST (UK) »

The Greyhound pub is still there and the Church, pub and Church Farmhouse make a fine group today.  The farmhouse is the Barnet Borough Museum.


London borough of Barnet must, I suspect have more than one museum, as the one im familiar with is in Wood St, Chipping Barnet.

The Hendon one is official & the Chipping Barnet on is a semi private venture

Offline steve_gus

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 78
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Diary of Nathaniel Bryceson (Part 6)
« Reply #264 on: Friday 10 September 10 13:31 BST (UK) »
A google search shows the Wood Street museum as the original, founded in the 1930's where the "church farmhouse museum" was opened 20 years later in 1955.

http://www.barnetmuseum.co.uk/

http://www.barnet.gov.uk/index/leisure-culture/museums-galleries/churchfarmhouse-history.htm

Looks as you say that barnet council seem to promote the farmhouse one and have the wood st as run by a local society. First page of the wood st link seems to promote an interesting looking diary....


Offline Mongibello

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 52
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Diary of Nathaniel Bryceson (Part 6)
« Reply #265 on: Friday 10 September 10 20:08 BST (UK) »
A google search shows the Wood Street museum as the original, founded in the 1930's where the "church farmhouse museum" was opened 20 years later in 1955.

http://www.barnetmuseum.co.uk/

http://www.barnet.gov.uk/index/leisure-culture/museums-galleries/churchfarmhouse-history.htm

Looks as you say that barnet council seem to promote the farmhouse one and have the wood st as run by a local society. First page of the wood st link seems to promote an interesting looking diary....
Of course up to 1965 Hendon and Barnet were separate boroughs with Finchley in between

Offline steve_gus

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 78
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Diary of Nathaniel Bryceson (Part 6)
« Reply #266 on: Saturday 11 September 10 04:39 BST (UK) »
Ive contacted you by messager off line Mongibello as dont want to bore others :)

Todays post looks like a bit of juicy financial scandal. I cant imagine a bank not wanting your money :)  Perhaps this is the start of the slippery slide for the business. With the recent cost of the gas installation you would expect they were doing well......

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,276
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Diary of Nathaniel Bryceson (Part 6)
« Reply #267 on: Saturday 11 September 10 06:49 BST (UK) »
Oooh yes, a nice bit of gossip today.

Does anyone know why the bank wouldn't take the money?

I love the way Nathaniel says of the bridge: "... it looketh quite a wreck..."  :D

Offline Siamese Girl

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,246
    • View Profile
Re: The Diary of Nathaniel Bryceson (Part 6)
« Reply #268 on: Saturday 11 September 10 08:16 BST (UK) »
I'm mystifyed as to why a bank wouldn't want to take money  ??? The London and Westminster Bank has quite a complicated history http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_Bank and still (kind of) exists today as NatWest - ironically their big advertising push these days is that they provide "helpful banking". Mr Lea would probably disagree.

Carole
CHILD Glos/London, BONUS London, DIMSDALE London, HODD and TUTT Sussex,  BONNER and PATTEN Essex, BOWLER and HOLLIER Oxfordshire, HUGH Lincolnshire, LEEDOM all.

Offline drykid

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The Diary of Nathaniel Bryceson (Part 6)
« Reply #269 on: Saturday 11 September 10 08:16 BST (UK) »
I cant imagine a bank not wanting your money :)

Well I do remember that when I first started working as a contractor, I had to open a new business account to pay my first paycheque into (since the cheque was in the name of my new limited company.) And to my amazement the bank that held my personal account refused to allow me to open a business account to pay the cheque into (because I had an existing consolidation loan with them and they refused to allow me to open a new account until that was cleared.)  So in the end I had to open a business account with a totally different bank just to be able to pay the cheque in, which annoyed me no end.

Although it's not really comparable with what Nat's describing, since if I'd already had a business account then no doubt they would've accepted the money.  I guess banking in those days was a more personal affair, and therefore more subject to the whims of the people concerned, so maybe this kind of thing was par for the course.