Hi Christine,
I think in the beginning (and from looking at Ann's other thread) that I thought she had John H but then was 'picking' his ancestry from censuses. Additonally, my thoughts were that he may have invented a father James on his marriage (s).
However, as it has transpired that doesn't seem to be the case.
Now I have come to realise that Ann needs some sort of birth confirmation re John H and as it is not apparently in the records because of the common name, then perhaps a baptism may show up because that would have his parents.
Whether this is a money saving exercise or there is a genuine need of help, we don't know, because she is not returning to this thread to acknowledge the very hard work everyone has put in to help her.
I can understand that people do find it difficult to find a post when they are newcomers to rootschat, however, the fact that she is sending PMs to posters indicates that she is reading this thread

It would seem more difficult to me for a novice to send a PM, than press the reply button.
As I have posted earlier, I am quite happy to think that Hannah and James are in 1871 at separate addresses, not yet being married so the easiest solution would be for Ann to apply for a birth registration using the parents names and James' occupation as references.
Unfortunately, because we are receiving these odd pm communications, it is detracting from the situation and making Ann seem discourteous and trying of my (maybe 'our') patience.
best wishes
heywood