Author Topic: 1921 census  (Read 10640 times)

Offline davidft

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #18 on: Monday 19 July 10 10:47 BST (UK) »
Then the figure of 17,012,560 in 2009 equates to over £72 million for the one year..

The 40 million suggested by the group of MPs seems to be an underestimate.


 ;D The 17,012,560 only equated to £72 million if everyone of the downloads was at a paid rate of £4.25 each !!!!!!!!!!

So on that basis and the unreliability of the extrapolations the £40 million is widely optimistic
James Stott c1775-1850. James was born in Yorkshire but where? He was a stonemason and married Elizabeth Archer (nee Nicholson) in 1794 at Ripon. They lived thereafter in Masham. If anyone has any suggestions or leads as to his birthplace I would be interested to know. I have searched for it for years without success. Thank you.

Offline jubee

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #19 on: Monday 19 July 10 11:13 BST (UK) »
I can't understand this nonsense about privacy and the 100 year rule. If that were the case, how is that I can find my grandparents' marriages from the 1930's, my parents' births from the 1940's and even my own birth from the 1970's on several BMD sites. It's not too difficult to extrapolate details on siblings as well.
Admittedly it doesn't give actual dates but the mothers' maiden name is on the births on these websites.

Offline Gartag

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 182
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #20 on: Monday 19 July 10 11:20 BST (UK) »
I wont tell if you don't jubee!!!!   lol

It does seem a bit over board.  Phone books give current names and adresses.  Umpteen salesmen ring everyday already knowing your name, address, where your from and what you do and ask you to 'confirm' in order to have a 'free' holiday.

Secrecy?  They know more about me then I do....  must get my memory fixed!
Main Stream:- Gregory, Bridgwater, Dazely.
Tributaries:- Broomhead, Warner, Eyre.
Areas: UK- Derbyshire 1750-1900, Manchester 1900- now,
        India- Jubblepore, Kirkee, Lucknow. (Bridgwater/Dazely 1890-1925)

Offline jubee

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #21 on: Monday 19 July 10 11:34 BST (UK) »
Perhaps it's a big government conspiracy  :o  and our ancestors never existed....lol. So as to keep us all on a wild goose chase and spending lots of money ;D
But seriously, I agree Gartag there is so much info about us out there in the public domain anyway I'm sure releasing the 1921 census wouldn't compromise things. The 1911 census had the sensitive info in the "Infirmity" column removed!!!!


Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #22 on: Monday 19 July 10 15:07 BST (UK) »

 ;D The 17,012,560 only equated to £72 million if everyone of the downloads was at a paid rate of £4.25 each !!!!!!!!!!

So on that basis and the unreliability of the extrapolations the £40 million is widely optimistic

David I agree those figures do seem high but they are worked out from the official figures and seem to be the most accurate currently available.
If you have any more accurate figures I would be extremely interested in seeing them.

The figure of £40 million was not a extrapolated figure as I mentioned in the earlier postings, but a figure independently suggested by a group of MPs for the 1911 census not historic figures for the 1901 census.

There does however seem to be an interest from MPs and the more people who write to MPs and Cabinet Ministers about allowing the release of the census the more likely it is there will be a successful outcome.

As mentioned before the 100 year rule was not brought in until 1966, 45 years after the 1921 census.
The 1841 and 1851 census were released in 1912 only 9 years before the 1921 census.
People if they thought about the census release would assume it would be released after about 60 or 70 years.
I.E. Within their lifetime.
Cheers
Guy
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.

Offline davidft

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #23 on: Monday 19 July 10 16:34 BST (UK) »

 ;D The 17,012,560 only equated to £72 million if everyone of the downloads was at a paid rate of £4.25 each !!!!!!!!!!

So on that basis and the unreliability of the extrapolations the £40 million is widely optimistic

David I agree those figures do seem high but they are worked out from the official figures and seem to be the most accurate currently available.
If you have any more accurate figures I would be extremely interested in seeing them.

The figure of £40 million was not a extrapolated figure as I mentioned in the earlier postings, but a figure independently suggested by a group of MPs for the 1911 census not historic figures for the 1901 census.
 

Guy,

Not wishing to get into a long debate on this but you can not say the £40 million is not extrapolated just because some MPs have dreamt it up. OK yes the MPs could have got it right but I highly suspect they haven't but as I have signed the official secrests act (not a joke) and don't fancy laying myself open to prosecution I won't say why
James Stott c1775-1850. James was born in Yorkshire but where? He was a stonemason and married Elizabeth Archer (nee Nicholson) in 1794 at Ripon. They lived thereafter in Masham. If anyone has any suggestions or leads as to his birthplace I would be interested to know. I have searched for it for years without success. Thank you.

Offline nestagj

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 908
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #24 on: Monday 19 July 10 17:44 BST (UK) »
I can't understand this nonsense about privacy and the 100 year rule. If that were the case, how is that I can find my grandparents' marriages from the 1930's, my parents' births from the 1940's and even my own birth from the 1970's on several BMD sites. It's not too difficult to extrapolate details on siblings as well.
Admittedly it doesn't give actual dates but the mothers' maiden name is on the births on these websites.


and our marriage in 1982 and our son's birth in 1983 and our grandson's birth in 2005 !!
N

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #25 on: Monday 19 July 10 18:26 BST (UK) »
The website in my opinion is nothing but a distraction exercise to divert our attention from cuts.
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)

Offline Parmesan

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,893
  • Dad 1921-2015
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #26 on: Monday 19 July 10 19:09 BST (UK) »
The website in my opinion is nothing but a distraction exercise to divert our attention from cuts.

that's too political RR!  naughty !

(but I'm dying to respond  ;D)
Paternal: Staffordshire, Shropshire, Lancashire, Cheshire, Durham, Wales, Arrondissements Oudenaarde and Gent, Belgium, -  - Maternal: Cheshire, Lancashire, Ireland