« Reply #203 on: Wednesday 04 August 10 18:54 BST (UK) »
Surely it's more accurate to say "Not all dressmakers were prostitutes, and not all prostitutes were dressmakers".
Or even better, "Some dressmakers were prostitutes, and some prostitutes were dressmakers".
How about "Not
all dressmakers were prostitutes, but
most prostitutes seemed to be dressmakers!" !!!
Assumptions are never very accurate and I was merely echoing the assumptions made elsewhere!
Lynn:- Shelton, Edwards, Looker, Platt, Ames, Bagley, Cadman, Cokes, Edmunds, Seymour, Waldren, Mulloy, Cockin/Cockayne
Tony:- Davies, Murphy, Kidd, Elwell, Pither, Roper, Marshall, Whelan, Lycett, Farley, Turner, Rhodes