Hi Kenace, can't solve your problem, unfortunately, but I would tend to disagree with Mort29, in that I have found it more usual to see the name of the father on baptism records, rather than the mother (if only one name is given) - unless it is an illegitimate child in which case the mother's name would be given, eg John son of Thomas Johnson, baptised 29 February 1710.
I'm a bit dubious also about the marriage, although rosie99 says that it is on the Lancashire parish registers site, so that is good.

The baptism entry I can find for John Johnson in 1710 shows no parents because it is a submitted record on IGI with no date either and is, perhaps, an assumption that men got married at the age of 25 (by which time they had completed their apprenticeships and had accumulated a little bit of money in order to be able to afford a wife), and the marriage on IGI is also a submitted entry, but if rosie99 says that it is on the Lancashire site then that would confirm, to me at least, that the marriage was genuine. But you do need to check it for yourself.
Sorry to be so pessimistic.

BumbleB