Dear Jds1949 and Redroger,
thanks for your insightful comments here!
In context with our ever-present issues of accidental or intentional misspelling, this fellow was of interest given the reference to AE Harrison, the confusion with his entire name and the way his circumstances were broadcast in the London Gazette. I agree absolutely that for this man to be AEH was very improbable. You have confirmed absolutely that he isn’t in contention
Notwithstanding this fellow’s unsuitability on this occasion, the issue of an error in spelling and the possibility that it could be intentional always begins the process of doubt in my mind. I absolutely agree with you that in this case to go to so much trouble in the creation of an entire history is much too complicated considering how easy it would have been to achieve the same end with simpler methods.
I have adopted a credo or overarching and governing methodology in the hunt for AEH which is “ never overlook or discount a coincidence”
Interestingly, I have never considered a Private previously. This change of philosophy has its origins in this forum thread, it may have some long term merit in the future, if all other leads are exhausted researching through the more conventional and logical processes.
Specifically, the technical issues associated with the unraveling of the MIC vagaries are fantastic, things such as “stamping” were unknown to me and quite perplexing albeit simple explanation. Unresolvable words like this in context with the obvious interests in this card do begin to take on a whole new mysterious character until broken down into logical sentences and meanings, as you so clearly, have done here.
At great expense to the management I've joined Ancestry tonight and took a look at the MIC that was referred to in the upper border on the original card, being A E Harrisson, ASC & 14 Lond Reg T/1071 - On the new card, a reverse reference to the original card in the top border was written (ie) Alfred Harrison 208291 referencing the first card to be viewed, So, quite obviously two cards, one man and an Army spelling mistake.
Following my MIC enquiries in Ancestry tonight, I located some other similar misspellings of Harrison, which I will investigate. I also researched a significant number of A Harrison's (non Officers) without any success at all.
It's a pity that Ancestry doesn't have the Officer's records.
Of significant interest, I entered the search phrase AIF into the Ancestry search engine and received 520 AIF Men and Officers who hold British Medal Index Cards. - Initially it appears that there are men and Officer’s who have almost identical MIC’s to AEH, complete with phrases such as “Suspense list” and “Disembarkation date” - I’m not sure what this means yet and I will continue to view the cards and try to ascertain some clue as to why AIF men have these cards and importantly any connection with a continuance of service into the British Army.
Thanks again
Ian