I notice that the Morning Post of 7th January, 1829 and others say that the "Lord Melville" with Captain Brown sailed from Portsmouth for New South Wales.
The whole article reads:
SHIP NEWS .
The Morning Chronicle Tuesday, January 6, 1829
Portsmouth Jan 3 and 4: N. to E. Arrived from London, the Corinthian, Chadwick, for New York; and sailed the Duke of Manchester, Hood for Jamaica; General Palmer, Thomas for madras; his majesty's ships Ranger & Nimrod, on secret service (not that secret if in newspaper my comment); and the whole of the outward bound except the Andromache, Law for Calcutta; General Palmer, Thomas for Madras; "Lord Melville" for New South Wales, and two others.
Next day the same newspaper said:
Portsmouth, Jan 5-N.E. Sailed the "Lord Melville", Brown, for New South Wales, General Palmer, Thomas for Madras; and Colombia, Wilson for Tobago. Put back the Reynolds, Roberts, for Jamaica with bowsprit sprung.
The same newspaper reported on January 13th, 1829
Two outward-bound East Indiamen passed down the Channel this morning, and one of them was believed to be the Lord Melville. The other vessel which was mentioned to have gone ashore near Boulogne, was a foreign galliot laden with wheat; crew saved. (Sounds to have pretty rough that day!)
There was a also a fishing smack called "Lord Melville", and a mail boat of the same name, that plied from Falmouth to the empire ports, and also Lord Melville himself.
On Monday December 1829, the same newspaper reported:
Arrived St Helena the Lord Melville, Brown; Providence Bowers from Batavia, Malay, Gillies, from Sumatra.
January 9, 1830:
SHIP NEWS:
East India Shipping:
The Lord Melville (Brown), from Batavia, has arrived off Penzance-sailed from thence 8th August, and from St Helena, 17th October.
Monday Jan 11th:
Portsmouth: Jan 9th, NW Arrived, Lord Melville-, from Batavia.
So maybe the "Lord Melville" did not leave London as such but left Portsmouth with the prisoners-it would make sense, rather than transport prisoners twice, just move the ship!
Tom
Tom