Author Topic: John and Mary Pearson (nee Deavis)  (Read 9034 times)

Offline crisane

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,541
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John and Mary Pearson (nee Deavis)
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday 18 May 10 06:58 BST (UK) »
1901 RG13/4906/37/6
Asham Westmorland
John S Mounsey 56 general labourer Askham
Sarah 36 Askham
John S 12 Dacre Cumberland
William J 10 Bampton Westmorland
Joseph 7 Lazonby Cumb
Margaret A 5 Askham
Jarard T 2 Askham
Mary J 1 mth Askham

Offline crisane

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,541
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John and Mary Pearson (nee Deavis)
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday 18 May 10 07:12 BST (UK) »
James born 1850
1871 RG10/5203/8/10
Blencorn Cumb
Broats (name of property?
John Clarkson and extended family farmer 56 acres
James Pearson 21 Farm servant indoors b Askham

1881
Askham Held? Head
James Pearson head 31 single domestic gardener's labourer b Askham
Margaret sister unm. 50 Cook b Askham
Richard Pearson Uncle 79 Rag carpet weaver b Great Strickland Westmorland

Offline crisane

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,541
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John and Mary Pearson (nee Deavis)
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday 18 May 10 07:22 BST (UK) »
1891 RG12/4327/39/6
Asham
James pearson 41 gardener's labourer
Annie Pearson 38
Robert 7
Frances 5
James 4
Mary E 1
All born Askham

Marriage James Pearson and Annie Kitchen Sept 1/4 1882 vol 10b page 933

1901 RG13/4906/38/7
Askham
James Pearson 51 Domestic gardener
Annie 47
Robert 17
Francis daughter 15
James 14
Mary6 E 11
All born Askham. No occupations for any of the children

Offline lyn luggo

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 17
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John and Mary Pearson (nee Deavis)
« Reply #30 on: Tuesday 18 May 10 08:21 BST (UK) »
You have been very busy - and great work!  Interesting about Thomas being a butcher.  He was a farmer when he came to Victoria but on death certificate in 1902 occupation butcher.  In Aust. 44 years, so that would be c. 1858, so assume Thomas will not be on 1861 census, nor brother Matthew, nor John, who it appears came about the same time, possibly together, and I assumethey were first three in family to emigrate.  A William and Sarah Pearson are listed as coming on the Tudor in 1864.  A family letter says that Sarah came to cook for her brothers!

Interesting that Sarah is not listed underneath as a scholar, just gardeners daughter and no occupation. What do you think? 
1861 RG09/3962/43/12
Askham
John Pearson 60 gardener born Morland Westmorland
Mary wife 51 gardener's wife
Sarah 13 gardener's daughter
James 11 scholar
Jane 9 scholar
Mary 7 granddaughter scholar boarder
Mary and children born Askham

Looking at James' children, 1891,  I assume Francis is Fannie, and Mary, much younger than the others and possibly James' favourite, is very likely Mamie referred to in letters.  There dont appear to be any other children? These are all mentioned in 2 letters.  When James died in 1919, he owned? a farm, and the family said they were going to keep it going.  Can we see what the census says in 1911  - he is still a domestic gardener in 1901 I see and wonder if son James has gone to America yet?
Aunt Mary and Pollie also mentioned in these letters.  If you have time, I would really appreciate following Mary (Lacklison) after the 1891 census.  I see she has a daughter Mary then aged 4, and is it possible that this Mary could be Pollie.  Sarah (Australia) had eldest daughter Mary who was called Pollie. When the rels visited in 1929, that would make this Mary approx. 42 - photo looked about 50, but then women looked older then?  If it is her, she didn't marry as name still Pearson and accompanying her mother? 
Also Nellie Pearson, any clues there?
Terrific information from you Crissane and really appreciated.  Thanks again. Lyn



Offline crisane

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,541
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John and Mary Pearson (nee Deavis)
« Reply #31 on: Wednesday 19 May 10 00:15 BST (UK) »
Thomas, Richard, Robert, Matthew and John are not on the 1861 census so we may assume that they left UK between 1851 and 1861. However I can't find records as yet placing them on the same ship.
I haven't searched for voyages for Sarah and Jane yet but the last census they appear on is the 1861.
Sarah on the 1861 as gardener's dau could be because she couldn't find work or she was helping her mother or they thought it sounded "posh."  No big deal.
James born 1850 is on the censuses up to 1901 did his son go to US?
1901
RG13/4886/133/5
craikhow Parade Dearham Cumb
James Lacklison 56 grocer shopkeeper own account bLoweswater
Mary 47 Askham
Mary dau 14 Dearham.

So all other children have left home.
i'll take a look at shipping records again.

Offline lyn luggo

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 17
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John and Mary Pearson (nee Deavis)
« Reply #32 on: Wednesday 19 May 10 03:16 BST (UK) »
thanks. Think Richard could have been later, maybe 1860. Dont know about Robert, but perhaps first 3 came together then Richard and Robert.  I found Sarah and William on the Tudor in 1864.  So many Pearsons on the list without christian names.  Jane would have been 11 or 12 when Sarah left.  It was said that Sarah came to cook for her brothers!

Thomas, Richard, Robert, Matthew and John are not on the 1861 census so we may assume that they left UK between 1851 and 1861. However I can't find records as yet placing them on the same ship.
I haven't searched for voyages for Sarah and Jane yet but the last census they appear on is the 1861.
Sarah on the 1861 as gardener's dau could be because she couldn't find work or she was helping her mother or they thought it sounded "posh."  No big deal.
James born 1850 is on the censuses up to 1901 did his son go to US?
1901
RG13/4886/133/5
craikhow Parade Dearham Cumb
James Lacklison 56 grocer shopkeeper own account bLoweswater
Mary 47 Askham
Mary dau 14 Dearham.

So all other children have left home.
i'll take a look at shipping records again.
James the father born 1850 stayed home, he died in 1919.  Son James born c. 1897 went to America, presumably before WW1, then came back to fight for Britain, then applied for a passport in 1919 to go back.

Just read a family letter from Fannie dated 1947, which mentions Robert and Nellie, so that is Fannie, daughter of James, her brother is Robert who was in Germany in the army in 1919, and am sure that Nellie is his wife, so that solves that one.  Her brother "Jimmie" is in America, and his daughter has written to Fannie.
Interesting another letter also that has just surfaced - from JP Lacklison in 1941 to Aust. so that is son of Mary, our "Aunt Mary" and she is still alive and nearly 88.  She is actually still alive in Fannie's letter in 1947, but failing.  That would make her about 94!  And from his letter, we now know who his children were.
Thanks again for terrific help.  Really getting this family sorted out now!

Offline crisane

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,541
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John and Mary Pearson (nee Deavis)
« Reply #33 on: Wednesday 19 May 10 06:10 BST (UK) »
Here is the death of your Aunt Mary Lacklison
Mary Lacklison age 96, 1949 Cockermouth Cumberland vol 1a page 82

There is another 2 years later
Mary Lacklison age 64 1951 Cockermouth Cumberland vol 1a page 88
This may be her dau who was 14 in 1901 so right age - that is if she didn't marry.

Offline crisane

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,541
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John and Mary Pearson (nee Deavis)
« Reply #34 on: Wednesday 19 May 10 06:19 BST (UK) »
Well here is a turn up for the books. Robert Lacklison son of Mary signed up with the Canadian forces in WW1 in 1915. Unfortunately there are only two pages but clearly states born Dearham Cumberland mother Mary.