marriage follow up census request please

[kascon]

and if mary id exist and she was still alive and that it was indeed aflred that died wher eis she in 1911. she is a couple of years younger than stanley.
karen

[carol8353]

May and Mary appear to be the same person.

A baby born 2 May 1900 should have been 10 months on the 1901 census- mayeb it was a mistranscription?

I've just given you May's DOB and her baptism date both in 1900.

The 4 births I have just typed out are the 4 live births she says she's had on the 1911 census and the one who died was Alfred- making it 3 still alive in 1911.

Carol

[kascon]

yes you are probably right.
ive found a marriage for kate ethel the daughter and a marriage for may which appears to be her name not mary. one to herbert bromige and the other to frederick neal. a birth for david bromige and two for girls to meal pamela and brenda. and as they are about the same age as my mum there is a chance that one or more are still alive.
also mum kate mary remarried herself to one arthur haigh in 1919 but looks like no more kids for her.

still the tree grows lol.

karen

[carol8353]

Karen

Take care when mentioning names of May's or Kate Ethel's children as she didn't marry until the late 1920's and they may still be alive- Rootschat do not allow names of those still living to be published on their message boards.

Carol

[kascon]

oh ok. sorry bout that.
ive got another one for you.

stanley marries in june quarter 1914 to someone called jones but... when i went in to the screen theres only 3 names and none of them are jones. so it appears theres a name missing on that page.

tried bulson jones births and theres one. stanley e in june 1915
mayeb stanley senior went to war.

karen

[carol8353]

Look for the Jones lady the other way round- you know it's Portsmouth in June 1914- so put all that in and JONES- you will see that it was a Violet M Jones who married Stanley Bulson- then look at the image itself,by clicking on the glasses.You will find that it has been mistranscribed as 1136 and NOT 1136 which is the correct page number.

I have informed Free BMD of the error.

The fact that they married in Portsmouth in 1914 sort of suggests that he might have been in the Navy doesn't it 
 
Carol

[kascon]

yes your right it does.
guess what i just looked up younger stanely bulsons marriage. and guess what. he marries one muriel neal so maybe he married a sister of his brother in law
as his sister married a neal

[kascon]

just folowing up the neal bulson marriage.
in mar quarter 1935

ohoh

Moderator Comment: Information removed as these people may be still alive.  Please do not post any details of birth after 1920.