I ordered seven certs on 23 March and six of them arrived on 23 April. I phoned them to query the missing one (the only marriage of the batch) and was told that the internal search system for marriages is still manual whereas births and deaths are electronic, so they take longer. This may help to explain some posters' queries above about marriages being delayed. (My missing cert has since arrived and thrown up some intriguing questions of parentage.)
As I have already explained.
I do also have two general questions about the service the GRO provides:
1. I take on board the explanation offered upthread for why each certificate is sent in a separate envelope, but this still seems daftly wasteful. I'm sure in the past I've ordered multiple certificates, including mixtures of Bs, Ms and Ds, and they've all arrived in the same envelope. It strikes me that if the system means they're mailed separately, then the system isn't fit for purpose and needs changing.
It is wasteful but at the same time it is very logical.
The GRO system is geared to produce the certificates in the shortest possible time.
This means that some certificates may be ready for dispatch before other certificates.
Imagine the complaints if they held back a number of certificates because one was delayed due to either having to be written by hand (due to the master being illegible) or due to having to go through a manual checking system.
2. More importantly, why doesn't the GRO (E&W) offer a similar service to that of the GRO (S), of providing downloadable, uncertified, copies of the register for a modest fee? If you really need a legally admissible certified copy in Scotland you have to get one using a similar process to that in E&W, but if all you want is the information on a certificate for personal interest, you don't need this level of bombproofing. I'm 5/8 English, 1/4 Scottish and 1/8 Northern Irish, and moreover the records for my English ancestry are more complete than for my Scottish forebears, so I know a lot more about my direct ancestors and side branches in England than elsewhere. Yet I have a lot more BMD certificates for my Scottish relatives because I download them as I need them, as the cost is not too burdensome. At £7, never mind £9.25, per item in England, there's no way I'd do that. I'd imagine that plenty of other people are in the same boat. Therefore, I reckon the GRO would easily recoup its costs by offering 'uncertified certificates' for download at say £2 per item alongside the existing official service.
Does anyone know whether this has ever been mooted as a possibility by the GRO? The same goes for Northern Ireland, too.
Yes, it has been mooted, not only by genealogists but by the GRO and by the Government but it cannot be provided.
The legislation that covers England & Wales prevents the registers being copied in such a way.
The Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1953 states-
"34(5) A certified copy of an entry in a register or in a certified copy of a register shall be deemed to be a true copy notwithstanding that it is made on a form different from that on which the original entry was made if any differences in the column headings under which the particulars appear in the original entry and the copy respectively are differences of form only and not of substance.
(6) The Registrar General shall cause any certified copy of an entry given in the General Register Office to be sealed or stamped with the seal of that Office ; and, subject to the foregoing provisions of this section, any certified copy of an entry purporting to be sealed or stamped with the said seal shall be received as evidence of the birth or death to which it relates without any further or other proof of the entry, and no certified copy purporting to have been given in the said Office shall be of any force or effect unless it is sealed or stamped as aforesaid."
It is however in theory possible to get a copy of register entry of birth, marriage or death for an event registered between 1836 and 1875 without being provided with a certified copy.
The exiting government did try to change the law with regards to the provision of certificates starting with a White Paper in 2000. Unfortunately the did not realise that they had to comply with legislation (or they did not understand the legislation) and were compelled to abandon their feeble attempt.
Since then they have been too embarrassed to try again.
Cheers
Guy