Author Topic: Family Search BMDs - problem  (Read 35199 times)

Offline David Buckley

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: Family Search BMDs - problem
« Reply #126 on: Thursday 05 August 10 23:54 BST (UK) »
Thanks. I was looking to find unknown spouses by matching volume page etc. While I did find some, I noticed that known persons were not turning up when both name fields were blank.

I find it hard to believe this is an upper limit error when there is no error message on blank names - unless the programmer forgot to put one in.

I have reported this problem on the feedback form.

David

Offline Oaks and Acorns

  • I am sorry but my email address is no longer working
  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 779
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Family Search BMDs - problem
« Reply #127 on: Friday 06 August 10 02:35 BST (UK) »
Good luck David.

I don't believe that it's a simple "upper limit" problem and I have tried to explain that error to the people at the LDS site. Please let us know how you get on.

Dara.

Offline shanew147

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,777
  • Dublin, Ireland
    • View Profile
Re: Family Search BMDs - problem
« Reply #128 on: Friday 06 August 10 11:06 BST (UK) »
The issue is possibly down to technical limitations of their webserver/database server setup. Database queries are sometimes done with an automatic restriction on numbers to prevent crashes or memory problems on the servers, and similar issues my arise with the user interface used - Adobe flash. The first questions I always need to know when working a new system with database storage is 'how many records might be involved ?', and 'how are any search results to be handled'. It can be unsafe to allow an unrestricted search.

If this type of numbers issue arises from a search the usual practice would be to either display a warning message on the search result, or to cancel the search and request more details from the user. The National Archives Census searches uses the latter tactic, although sometimes it can be fooled.

The search algorithm also seem to be a little flawed on the site in its current version, as it can give different results depending on exactly how you carry out the search. When I was on to Familysearch about the recent placename problems they said they were planning an update to the site for later this year (I think 'late summer' was mentioned). This upgrade/fix was also due to include searches by registration district.



Shane
Remember to check the Resource boards :  Ireland, Dublin, Antrim & Cork (and stickies at the top of other county sub-forums)    
My Surname Interests

Offline David Buckley

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: Family Search BMDs - problem
« Reply #129 on: Friday 06 August 10 12:03 BST (UK) »
Thanks Dara and Shane. What ever the reason as long as we are aware of these limitations and the data is not misleading then we can't complain, after all it is free.  If I get a reply to my feedback I will post it here.  If I don't get a reply I'll report the problem at the LDS library next time I'm there - they have a 'hotline' to the experts.

David

PS
I was unable to find the answer at the London LDS library, however they have most of the original returns: Births 1864-1913, 1930-1955 Marriages 1845-1870 and Deaths 1864-1870 on film.


Offline myluck!

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,769
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Family Search BMDs - problem
« Reply #130 on: Saturday 16 April 11 10:08 BST (UK) »
Sorry if this has come up before but I have just searched for a marriage record for a MARY LEDWITH from 1915 to 1935 as 1925 +/- 10 years
I got one reply from south Dublin that gives a Vol and Page number but NO YEAR
How can I find out what year it was??

She was listed as a nurse child with a relative in 1901 and was the informant on a death in 1914 so she obviously stayed with the family. Hence the interest

Thanks for any insight
Kearney & Bourke/ Johns & Fox/ Mannion & Finan/ Donohoe & Curley
Byrne [Carthy], Keeffe/ Germaine, Butler/ McDermott, Giblin/ Lally, Dolan
Toole, Doran; Dowling, Grogan/ Reilly, Burke; Warren, Kidd [Lawless]/ Smith, Scally; Mangan, Rodgers/ Fahy, Calday; Staunton, Miller
Further generations:
Brophy Coleman Eathorn(e) Fahy Fitzpatrick Geraghty Haverty Keane Keogh Nowlan Rowe Walder

Offline shanew147

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,777
  • Dublin, Ireland
    • View Profile
Re: Family Search BMDs - problem
« Reply #131 on: Saturday 16 April 11 10:45 BST (UK) »
based on the 'digital folder number' match (4195895) on this list - I'd say between 1898 and 1901

You would probably have to check the index books in the GRO Research room to establish the full details..


Shane

Remember to check the Resource boards :  Ireland, Dublin, Antrim & Cork (and stickies at the top of other county sub-forums)    
My Surname Interests

Offline myluck!

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,769
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Family Search BMDs - problem
« Reply #132 on: Saturday 16 April 11 12:28 BST (UK) »
Thanks for this Shane - not the correct lady as she was only 7 in 1901
Kearney & Bourke/ Johns & Fox/ Mannion & Finan/ Donohoe & Curley
Byrne [Carthy], Keeffe/ Germaine, Butler/ McDermott, Giblin/ Lally, Dolan
Toole, Doran; Dowling, Grogan/ Reilly, Burke; Warren, Kidd [Lawless]/ Smith, Scally; Mangan, Rodgers/ Fahy, Calday; Staunton, Miller
Further generations:
Brophy Coleman Eathorn(e) Fahy Fitzpatrick Geraghty Haverty Keane Keogh Nowlan Rowe Walder

Offline shanew147

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,777
  • Dublin, Ireland
    • View Profile
Re: Family Search BMDs - problem
« Reply #133 on: Wednesday 27 April 11 22:37 BST (UK) »
some new filter options have just appeared on main familysearch website - a little tricky to use at first, but look like they might be useful ...

see the learn more link


Shane

Remember to check the Resource boards :  Ireland, Dublin, Antrim & Cork (and stickies at the top of other county sub-forums)    
My Surname Interests

Offline annclare

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,434
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Family Search BMDs - problem
« Reply #134 on: Wednesday 27 April 11 22:47 BST (UK) »
Shane
Thanks for the information. It appears very complicated.
annclare
Kerrisk, Healy, McGuire, Duggan - Kerry and US
Tuohy/Toohey,Gorman, Purcell, Fanning- Holycross Tipperary