Author Topic: Baby Lucy Ann Blackmore not with her mother on 1891 census night WHY!!!  (Read 4171 times)

Offline lizdb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,307
    • View Profile
Re: BABY LUCY ANN BLACKMORE NOT WITH HER MOTHER ON 1891 CENSUS NIGHT WHY!!!
« Reply #9 on: Friday 05 March 10 16:55 GMT (UK) »
Good idea of duckweed's, but as she is stated as age 11 in 1901 it does look like the same Lucy and not a second one.
Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk
Parker - Sussex
Kemp - Essex
Farrington - Essex
Boniface - West Sussex

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline DJFRENCH

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,464
  • My grandmother, life in India
    • View Profile
Re: BABY LUCY ANN BLACKMORE NOT WITH HER MOTHER ON 1891 CENSUS NIGHT WHY!!!
« Reply #10 on: Friday 05 March 10 17:04 GMT (UK) »
i've looked to see if she was with the Shipleys in 191 but she was not.....


i reckon they hid her under a bush !!

debz
Cutcliffe- Devon
Courtenay Powderham Castle
Barnard -Oxford and Claines
Tollet - Begbroke
Gamble and Clement Calcutta
SHAW-BETHNAL GREEN,MIDDLESEX
WILD-BETHNAL GREEN,MIDDLESEX
GAMBLE-BARNSTABLE.DEVON

Offline DJFRENCH

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,464
  • My grandmother, life in India
    • View Profile
Re: BABY LUCY ANN BLACKMORE NOT WITH HER MOTHER ON 1891 CENSUS NIGHT WHY!!!
« Reply #11 on: Friday 05 March 10 17:13 GMT (UK) »
theres a "baby not named " with a Blackmore family in Essex bur says baby born in essex also a 50 yr old NURSE sarah Cramphorn born harlow

william Blackmore born devon CLAYHIDON age 41 farmer , wife anna

one of the sons called Walter !

census has them under BLACHMAN living in Willingale Doe
Cutcliffe- Devon
Courtenay Powderham Castle
Barnard -Oxford and Claines
Tollet - Begbroke
Gamble and Clement Calcutta
SHAW-BETHNAL GREEN,MIDDLESEX
WILD-BETHNAL GREEN,MIDDLESEX
GAMBLE-BARNSTABLE.DEVON

Offline DJFRENCH

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,464
  • My grandmother, life in India
    • View Profile
Re: BABY LUCY ANN BLACKMORE NOT WITH HER MOTHER ON 1891 CENSUS NIGHT WHY!!!
« Reply #12 on: Friday 05 March 10 17:15 GMT (UK) »
ps ...says baby age under 1 /12
Cutcliffe- Devon
Courtenay Powderham Castle
Barnard -Oxford and Claines
Tollet - Begbroke
Gamble and Clement Calcutta
SHAW-BETHNAL GREEN,MIDDLESEX
WILD-BETHNAL GREEN,MIDDLESEX
GAMBLE-BARNSTABLE.DEVON


Offline duckweed

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: BABY LUCY ANN BLACKMORE NOT WITH HER MOTHER ON 1891 CENSUS NIGHT WHY!!!
« Reply #13 on: Friday 05 March 10 17:26 GMT (UK) »
Looks strong possibility that you've found her

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,443
    • View Profile
Re: BABY LUCY ANN BLACKMORE NOT WITH HER MOTHER ON 1891 CENSUS NIGHT WHY!!!
« Reply #14 on: Friday 05 March 10 19:00 GMT (UK) »
Hello everyone,

the Essex family have a 10 yr old Mary Ann Blackmore in 1901 and there is a birth registration for June quarter 1891.

I too have speculated on the situations already outlined but there is also the possibility that Lucy Ann may just have been omitted - too small to think of by whoever filled in census.  :-\

heywood
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk