Author Topic: Halpins of Co. Wicklow, Portarlington and Dublin City - Part 2  (Read 96261 times)

Offline Shanachai

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Halpins of Wicklow County, Portarlington County Laois, and Dublin City.
« Reply #180 on: Thursday 10 June 10 10:14 BST (UK) »
Riot In Ireland.
[/b]
     
     Our Dublin correspondent telegraphed last night: - “A serious riot occurred in Arklow on Friday night, and was renewed yesterday, in consequence of three of the town pumps having been closed by order of the Local Government Board, after a report had been made by Dr. Halpin, medical officer of health, and an analysis of the water by Dr. Cameron of this city.  The fishermen and their families, who had used the pumps, were indignant at their being closed, and, having assembled with other townspeople to the number of several hundreds strong, lighted paraffin and rolled tar barrels through the town to the terror of the respectable inhabitants.  They proceeded to Dr. Halpin’s residence, broke the windows, and attempted to burn the house by placing a lighted tar barrel at the door.  Dr. Halpin, on passing through the town, was followed by a mob of 500 persons, who hooted and threatened him, and the disturbance became so serious that it was thought necessary to have 40 additional policemen draughted into the town last evening.  Two constables were seriously injured while endeavouring to quell the riot on Friday night.  One of them was knocked down, kicked, and a lighted tar barrel was rolled over him, some of the rioters even attempted to hold him down under the barrel.  An attempt was made last night to burn Dr. Halpin in effigy, and 33 of the rioters, whose names have been obtained by the police, have been summoned before the magistrates [what happened to them?  Any mention of either the riot or the trials of the rioters arrested in the Wicklow/Arklow newsletters?].  The police were stoned last night, and had to patrol the town all night.  Dr. Halpin cannot leave his house in consequence of the threats of violence, and has been obliged to support a deputy.”
-   The Times, January 26th 1880.
Similar story printed in the Hampshire Telegraph and the Sussex Chronicle.

     It seems very little is needed to produce a riot in Ireland just now.  This perhaps is not to be wondered at, considering the condition of the people in many districts and the amount of agitation there has been.  But the riot reported from Arklow was more than ordinarily unjustifiable.  It seems that three pumps in the place were found to supply water unfit for human consumption and two doctors certified to this fact.  The pumps were accordingly closed by the police.  This did not meet with the approval of the fishermen who used them, and they expressed their ill-feeling against Dr. Halpin, who had analyzed the water, by breaking the windows of his house and attempting to burn it down with lighted tar barrels.  Then they rolled flaming tar barrels through the street, passing one of them over the body of a policeman whom they knocked down.  On Saturday night the riot continued, the police had to patrol the town, and Dr. Halpin could not leave his house.  It seems rather hard upon the respectable inhabitants and the police that they should be kept in fear of their lives because the fishermen hold a different opinion from a doctor on the abstruse question of laboratory and palate analysis.  One is afraid, however, to speculate as to what might happen in London if all our doubtful supplies of water were cut off.

- from The Pall Mall Gazette, “Occasional Notes”, Monday January 26th 1880.

Offline Shanachai

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Halpins of Wicklow County, Portarlington County Laois, and Dublin City.
« Reply #181 on: Thursday 10 June 10 10:26 BST (UK) »
THE LATE SWINDLE AT WICKLOW.
[/b]

2a.
   
      A gentlemanly-looking young man named Walter Sorrell alias Martin was indicted for obtaining the sum of 1s. 6d by false pretences from Mr. Edwin Halpin on the 17th September, 1875.
     Sergeant Armstrong, Messrs. Ryan Q.C., and Anderson appeared for the Crown.
     Mr. Lover, instructed by Mr. Duff, defended the accused.
     Sergeant Armstrong opened the case.  He said the traverser was charged with the serious offence of obtaining money under false pretences.  Amongst other means of public entertainments which were latterly becoming fashionable was the reading of pieces from select authors, chiefly in the English language, accompanied occasionally by musical contributions.  These or kindred entertainments had been respectably brought forward and respectably conducted, and proved very remunerative.  With these circumstances the prisoner appeared to have been thoroughly aquainted, and being in want of that very necessary commodity in this life – money – he conceived the design of representing to the people of Wicklow that a concert and reading were about to be given for the entertainment and gratification of all those who could afford money.  Besides the mere circumstance of this announcement the prisoner appeared to have surrounded it by every suggestion that could attract interest to the object.  That it might add additional zest it was stated that the money was to be applied towards promoting an object which attracted considerable public attention, namely, the testimonial to Captain Webb, who swam across the Straits of Dover.  The prisoner hired the coffee room of the Marine Hotel, for which he agreed to pay 30s.  He then proceeded to Mr. McPhail and ordered circulars and posters.  In the circular he had the audacity to announce that Miss Florence Marryat would give a reading, assisted by Signor Tagliafico, the popular basso, and Miss Ellen Corrani, prima donna, Royal Italian Opera Company, and Lindsay Sloper, solo pianist.  The first named lady was now married to Colonel Rosschurch, but Florence Marryat was the name by which she was known in the world of letters.  She represented to a certain extent the genius of her eminent father, Captain Marryat – a man in his time who contributed much to the beautiful and instructive literature of the day.  She bore a name attractive, therefore, from ancestral connexion, and additionally attractive by her own personal graces – Et virtus gratier, veniens in corpora pulchro.  It would be proved that Miss Marryat had no communication whatever with the prisoner, and that she had no intention of coming over to Ireland at that time of the year.  Mr. Halpin seeing the posters went to the hotel, and purchased a ticket from the prisoner.  Of course, no entertainment took place, and the prisoner decamped by the 8 train to Dublin.
     Mrs. Rosschurch examined by Mr. Ryan – Before I was married my name was Florence Marryat.  I am a daughter of Captain Marryat.  I was in London in the month of September last.  I never saw Walter Sorrell before today.  I never authorised him to announce that I would appear in the county Wicklow.  I never had communication with him on any subject.  I did not engage with anybody to appear in Wicklow.  I did not come to Ireland in that part of September.
     Cross examined – I have been in the habit of giving readings in Ireland as well as in England.  I gave readings for Mr. Frazer in Cork, Belfast and Dublin.  He was not at all like the prisoner.  He was in the telegraph office in Dublin.  He owes me £89.  I applied to a solicitor, and he made him give me three bills which were all dishonoured.  Those persons generally have subordinates under them.
     Mr. William McPhail stated – I am a printer and stationer in this town.  In the month of September last I recollect the prisoner coming into my office.  He told me an entertainment was to take place in the hotel, and ordered me to print handbills, which were to be circulated.  He told me

Offline Shanachai

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Halpins of Wicklow County, Portarlington County Laois, and Dublin City.
« Reply #182 on: Thursday 10 June 10 10:29 BST (UK) »
2b.

Miss Florence Marryat was coming.  I purchased some of the tickets, and went to the hotel.  There was no entertainment.
     Mr. W. F. McPhail stated he was present when the prisoner came into the printing office on the 15th September.  He ordered circulars to be printed, and sent by hand to the gentry living near Wicklow, and particularly to his Grace the Archbishop of Dublin.  Upon seeing the prisoner on the following Friday witness asked him why he had not printed tickets.  He expressed surprise they had not been sent, and he then wrote the tickets.  The prisoner told witness that he was not regularly employed by Miss Marryat, and that he was only obliging her.  Witness went to the hotel, but did not witness any entertainment.  The prisoner told him that Miss Marryat and party had been at the Seven-churches that day and had stopped at the residence of his Grace the Archbishop of Dublin on their way to Wicklow.
     Mr. Robert Halpin – I am Postmaster in the town of Wicklow.  The prisoner came to my office on the 15th Sept., and handed me a letter purporting to come from Mrs. Rosschurch authorising him to announce a musical entertainment.  He asked me to furnish him with the names of the resident gentry.  I wrote a list.  I told him that half-penny wrappers would do to enclose the circulars in.  No, he said, Miss Marryat had another style of doing business, and had her crest and monogram on her envelopes.  He objected to the paper on the room in the hotel.
     Edwin Halpin stated – I recollect in the month of September last seeing a poster announcing that Miss Marryat was coming.  On the evening of the 17th I went to the hotel and purchased a ticket from the prisoner.  The train was coming in, and he said Miss Marryat is now coming. 
     Miss Florence Banks said – I was at the hotel that evening.  I could not identify the prisoner at all.  The gentleman at the hotel told me he expected Miss Marryat and the party.
     Mr. Lover’s defence was that the accused was acting for another person, who had previously swindled Miss Marryat.
     The jury, without leaving the box, convicted the prisoner. 
     His Lordship in sentencing him said he had been found guilty on evidence which could leave no doubt on the mind of any person that this offence of fraud had been committed by him.  It was no doubt a very audacious fraud, and one which could not be tolerated in any society.  Day after day they had passed sentences upon poor wretched creatures who were driven to crime owing to want of education and other causes; but it was difficult to know how to deal with a case of this kind.  The prisoner looked like a man of education – of good presence and of gentlemanly demeanour.  He had apparently mixed in good society.  He (his Lordship) knew nothing of his antecedents; but whether they would be in the prisoner’s favour or not he was not aware.  He should make no inquiry about them; but would deal with the case as he found it.  He went on to remark on the unwarrantable use the prisoner had made of the names of Miss Marryat and others; but the public should be protected from adventurers of his class.  The sentence of the court would be that he be imprisoned for four months with hard labour.
     This concluded the criminal business of the assizes.
-   The Wicklow Newsletter, Saturday, March 25th, 1876.

Offline BillW

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Halpins of Wicklow County, Portarlington County Laois, and Dublin City.
« Reply #183 on: Thursday 10 June 10 11:00 BST (UK) »
I am attaching as promised to Marie (mkent) a tree of the James Halpin family.  I have not accepted information on more than a few generations as it is not my personal family but I am always happy to accept amendments and additions.  Not shown in this chart is that we know James' mother was Elizabeth and that he had a sister Margaret.  However, I suspect he had perhaps many more siblings.

Bill


Offline kenneth cooke

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 439
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Halpins of Wicklow County, Portarlington County Laois, and Dublin City.
« Reply #184 on: Sunday 13 June 10 03:20 BST (UK) »
Re Post 165, from Ray:

Mark Halpen, an Irish apothecary who married Lady Lawley in 1730, died at Bath, England in 1768 (reported 13.8.1768).
Where would his will, if any, have been processed ? I imagine that, if he left an estate in England, it would have been processed there, otherwise in Ireland.
I have managed to obtain details of an Irish will before  (Bentham's abstract),
which gave only names of the beneficiaries, and their relationship, the wife, eldest son, and then other children, including the married names of  daughters.
If the will had been processed in England, how would I go about getting the details ?
Ken

Offline J.M. Flannery

  • I am sorry but my emails are no longer working
  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 235
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Halpins of Wicklow County, Portarlington County Laois, and Dublin City.
« Reply #185 on: Sunday 13 June 10 15:26 BST (UK) »
Hi all, including Marie L. Remember me in Wicklow when you came to visit Miss Manning? Had no address for you or e-mail. Lovely to make this connection with you again.

Have just made the Halpin/Eaton connection today
 Census 1901: b2 in Wentworth Place (Wicklow Town, Wicklow)

http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Wicklow/Wicklow_Town/Wentworth_Place/1817952/

Julia
Doyle, Malone, Ryan, Wicklow.
Murray of Arklow.
(O)Carroll of Annamoe, & Cornagower, Brittas, Wicklow, & Co Carlow.
Waters, Haughton, Leviston, Goggin. Kavanagh Wicklow.
Lavender and Newman of Ballyhad, Rathdrum.

Offline mkent

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Halpins of Wicklow County, Portarlington County Laois, and Dublin City.
« Reply #186 on: Sunday 13 June 10 15:57 BST (UK) »
Hi, I thought I must know  you!  I am still around and visiting Wicklow, I am sending this link to a decendent of Eaton Halpin, she has been trying to sort the family tree out.

Offline noddie11

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Halpins of Wicklow County, Portarlington County Laois, and Dublin City.
« Reply #187 on: Sunday 13 June 10 19:39 BST (UK) »
Hello. Thanks to mkent, i have found your site. I am researching my husbands line. His mother was grand daughter of Margaret Brown and James Eaton Halpin. They had 2 children, Dorothy Frances Bestall Halpin b 1892and Stopford John Halpin b 1894. Dorothy married Eric Muschamp and Margaret my mother in law is their daughter b 1922.I would love any information on this line. I will plough through this iste as well.

Thanks.
Debbie

Offline mkent

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Halpins of Wicklow County, Portarlington County Laois, and Dublin City.
« Reply #188 on: Monday 14 June 10 15:44 BST (UK) »
I spoke to my cousins the Bayleys in Carlow yesterday, all they could tell me about the family was that their father's name was Abraham, born 1880, proboly in Moneygrath, he had four brothers, Bill, Ben, John and Sam.  Theirs father's name was also Sam.   They apologise for not being able to be of more help, but would love to know what the link is between Bayleys and Halpins.