Author Topic: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier  (Read 44795 times)

Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,827
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #243 on: Saturday 26 March 11 17:41 GMT (UK) »
I don't think there's a marriage.  Thomas/Robert Hollingsworth was of course free to remarry after Isabella's death in 1866, but he doesn't seem to have been too bothered about social niceties - and of course Eliza may already have been married to someone else in any event...
Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)

Offline DarrenMW

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #244 on: Tuesday 29 March 11 13:38 BST (UK) »
no sighting of Robert Thomas Hollingsworth (Walker) post 1882 at Bodmin Gaol, courtesy HM Navy?

Any such sighting would have serious implications to the theory that he morphs into Thomas Richey circa 1883 (Richeys enlistment in army)


No such sighting would certainly be addition by subtraction!
 :)

Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,827
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #245 on: Tuesday 29 March 11 13:48 BST (UK) »
No sightings by me! Unfortunately the National Archives page at http://yourarchives.nationalarchives.gov.uk/index.php?title=Naval_prisons suggests that naval prisoners' records have not survived. (BTW did the record you downloaded explain why he ended up there?).

While I think of it, am I right in remembering that Thomas Richey has not been traced in the 1901 census? If so, did his Army records assist on where he was at that time (South Africa perhaps)?
Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)

Offline DarrenMW

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #246 on: Tuesday 29 March 11 18:52 BST (UK) »
The reason for his prison term was tough to decipher on is naval record. Something about 'going to shore.' To warrant dismissal from the navy as well as a prison term as a first offence for a young boy, one may assume it was the Captain's wife he mustve taken to shore!  :o

I will upload onto Ances*** and invite you to view it if that is an option?

Richeys miltary record does list him as being in Sth Africa just prior to his leaving the army in 1895. However this doesnt marry up with his regiments official  movements at the time, which was just prior to the Zulu wars.

Per an army historian, movement between units was fairly commonplace. i need to check further. Family gossip was that he also served in Ireland, something that is missing from his record, although British Army certainly were present in Ireland at that time.

I have no concerte proof of his Army service post 1895 though;yet.

I still feel military after 1895 is highly likely.





Offline beckton

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 44
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #247 on: Wednesday 30 March 11 15:47 BST (UK) »
Blimey darren where did you get all this infor from.

I hope you can upload them as i would love to see it.

Hollingsworth.Radwell, Thompson, Hill,Padwell,Epathite,Bryan, Hall,Tyrell,Taylor,Areas are Bath, Hampshire,Hertfordshire,Sussex,Middlesex, London

Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,827
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #248 on: Thursday 31 March 11 21:41 BST (UK) »
In a fascinating development, Jan has PM'd me to give the details from the recently-arrived birth certificate for Thomas Robert Hollingsworth WALKER, who was born on 23 May 1864 at 10 Brookes Market, St Andrew Holborn - parents' details given as "Robert WALKER, comedian, and Eliza formerly PICKFORD". I have added these details to the timeline on page 14 of this thread.

Brookes Market no longer has an active market, but still exists: http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/738853
Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)

Offline DarrenMW

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #249 on: Thursday 31 March 11 22:41 BST (UK) »
i saw that, and honestly didnt know what to make of it.
I certainly think its our guy, with Mr Hollingsworth assuming yet another alias.
What are your thoughts Anna?

I'll fetch the gin and vodka!

Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,827
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #250 on: Thursday 31 March 11 22:52 BST (UK) »
Agreed it's the same guy/family - helpfully the birthdate is exactly right for the Robert HOLLINGSWORTH whose naval records you have and who was on the Impregnable in 1881.

But PICKFORD? As if we didn't have enough surnames going on! From Jan's discoveries of the births of Alice and Eliza in the 1850s (both as WALKER with middle name Hollingsworth) it appears that our thespian's unofficial family were using WALKER from an early stage. But of course SMITH then appears as their surname in the 1861 census and as Bertha's mother's supposed maiden name in 1870.

If they were trying to cover their tracks, they did a good job ::).

Mine's a Bloody Mary...

Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)

Offline DarrenMW

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #251 on: Thursday 31 March 11 23:48 BST (UK) »
same birthdate as the navy lad Robert Hollingsworth!