Author Topic: ancestry tree  (Read 3835 times)

Offline Nick29

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,273
    • View Profile
Re: ancestry tree
« Reply #9 on: Friday 29 January 10 22:11 GMT (UK) »
Personally I really do wish if people publish their trees on Ancestry they would make them available for anyone who wishes to see them. At the moment there are two people with "private" trees who have not bothered to reply even after I have sent several requests over time to view trees which list my known relatives.
I don't know which of the two is upsetting me most. One has lots of information (stories) on my Uncle's family, and the other has I believe at least four pictures of my GGGrandfather. I would love to know what he looked like!
I asked if this person (in the States) if he would privately email me the pictures if it wasn't acceptable for me to view his whole tree. No response!
Why do people bother with internet trees if they want them to be so strictly private??
People on Rootschat are so kind and helpful. Perhaps I am being silly and naive expecting others to be the same.
This is making me frankly miserable.  :'(


For some people genealogy is a long-term obsession and for others it's a flash in the pan.  I do know a couple of people who started researching their trees, and then dropped them like a hot brick when the going got tough. 

I wouldn't take it personally  :)

RIP 1949-10th January 2013

Best Wishes,  Nick.

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline BridgetM

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,456
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: ancestry tree
« Reply #10 on: Monday 01 February 10 12:12 GMT (UK) »
My tree on Ancestry is private, but only because I don't want to make it public until I have verified all the information on it (with BCs, MCs, DCs, parish records, wills, etc.)  There is already so much mis-information on Ancestry--ancestors who should have been born in Westmorland, England but are instead born in Westmorland, Jamaica!  Ancestors who married years after they died! 
(If someone asks to see my tree, I send them an invitation to view it, but with the caveat that not everything is verified.)

Offline Nick29

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,273
    • View Profile
Re: ancestry tree
« Reply #11 on: Monday 01 February 10 12:59 GMT (UK) »
The onus for verification is for the one receiving the information, not the one giving it  :)

RIP 1949-10th January 2013

Best Wishes,  Nick.

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline NEILKE

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 798
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: ancestry tree
« Reply #12 on: Monday 01 February 10 13:09 GMT (UK) »
my wife and my tree on ancestry are both private the main reason which might sound daft is years ago when i first started my mam said your great aunt would not like others to know all our buisnes (her grandfather was in a poorhouse i dont know if she knew about it) but now i have family who want to know just the juicy bits but they are not preparred to look about.
neil
kenny from ireland befre moveing to north shields  flaxen/flexon from cumnor then sunderland robinson from rothbury then north shields urqhart somewhere in scotland then sunderland


Offline Trillium62

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 62
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: ancestry tree
« Reply #13 on: Monday 01 February 10 15:38 GMT (UK) »
I've got two trees on Ancestry: one only recently public and one that will probably stay private for a while.

When the now-public one was under construction, it was just that, under construction, and I was learning the ropes.  Once I felt confident enough and had corrected some newbie errors, I went public - including once being overly enthusiastic and following the wrong leads from several other trees.  Going public was several weeks ago, but it's still indexed as a private tree, although it seems people can see it now if they click the right buttons.

The private one is a research tree, full of suppositions, experiments, notes and questions to myself, etc., and even has one deliberately false scenario.  The false scenario was setting up a man of the same age with the same name in the same town as a cousin so that I had a place to put him.  That way I could research everything about him to determine if he was an impediment to linking "my guy" as being my great-grandfather before he came to Canada.  Turns out, they were different people. 

(That goodness I eliminated the other guy.  He married his own daughter's stepdaughter.  His son-in-law was also his father-in-law!  To make matters worse, the two men had married sisters about 15 years before.   :o )

I have a note on my great-grandfather's profile on my public tree that research is being conducted on an English family and that that information is in a private tree.  The note says that people can send me a message requesting an invitation, but I wanted to make sure that they were aware of the shortcomings of the research tree. 

Carol
England: Noller, Benham, Newson, Ling, Sunley, Hampson, Allport
Ireland: Johnston, Bamford, Craig, McQuoid
Scotland: Anderson
Canada and the U.S.:  All of the above!

Offline marzy loo

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 31
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: ancestry tree
« Reply #14 on: Monday 01 February 10 19:05 GMT (UK) »
Personally I am very happy to share with anyone the information I have found. Usually the only ones interested are part of the same family lines - its seems likely sharing with long distant relatives.  I have found out a lot of relevant information from others via the various sites, especially Rootschat and Ancestry and the generosity of those contributing.  I think it only fair that I contribute to the family history researchers out there any information that I find.
hello im like you i would willing share info,but unfortainly most of them are pay sites.so i am asking if there is any kind soul who could look at an ancerestry family tree for me,as there is just no way i could afford to bec0me a full member and look for myself. the name is gordon kelman maitland whyte,but only if they are already a member and dont have to spend there own money.thank you, marzy loo

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,147
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: ancestry tree
« Reply #15 on: Monday 01 February 10 19:14 GMT (UK) »
hello im like you i would willing share info,but unfortainly most of them are pay sites.so i am asking if there is any kind soul who could look at an ancerestry family tree for me,as there is just no way i could afford to bec0me a full member and look for myself. the name is gordon kelman maitland whyte,but only if they are already a member and dont have to spend there own money.thank you, marzy loo

Hi

The only tree I can see on there is a private one and therefore you would have to contact the person for information.

Why don't you start a thread on here and ask people to help you look for information?

Jan
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk