1900/1910 NY LOOKUP Please

[brakn]

Looking for Thomas and Bridget McHugh in NYC in 1900 and perhaps in 1910. Also Kate and Michael Dempsey who would've been on the 1910.

Any help would be appreciated.

[shellyesq]

The 1900 Census is available for free here:  http://pilot.familysearch.org/recordsearch/start.html#start

Any information that you have about them (ages, immigration dates, occupations, etc.) would be helpful.

[PaulineJ]

Was Kate their Daughter?

1900:  Married 1884.

Thomas McHugh     38
Bridget McHugh    38
Kate McHugh    15
John P McHugh    10
Chas McHugh    7
Lauretta McHugh    2
Leonard McHugh    10/12

[brakn]

Thomas and Bridget(Monaghan) married in England in 1884 and emigrated, I presume, shortly after.

Kate Dempsey, Bridget's neice, arrived in 1900 aged 22 and Michael Dempsey, Bridget's nephew, arrived in 1907 aged 22.

What I need is Bridget's place of birth. Ireland somewhere!!

Michael and Kate were both born in England.

Again thanks.

[PaulineJ]

I can see the 1900 family in 1920 nad CAtherine is declared as unwed.

1920. Cheektowaga, Erie, New York
Thomas McHugh     56
Bridget McHugh    56
Katherine McHugh    34
Leonard McHugh    21
Loretta McHugh    22

Can't see 1910

[PaulineJ]

There is this family unit in 1910 with certain similarities. Image is quite clear.
Suggest that you verify for yourself. Ancestry Library edition contains this dataset
(Erie, NY)

Thomas Buster     47  Hotel proprietor
Bridget Buster    47
Kate Buster    28
John Buster    20
Charles Buster    17
Loretta Buster    13
Leonard Buster    10

[PaulineJ]

POSSIBLE candidates for t'others.
Manhattan.

Arthur Powell     31  Book-keeper
Catherine Powell    28
Florence Powell    2
Marion Powell    1 6/12
Essie Powell    4/12
Michael Dempsey    26 Bro-in-law. Stableman
Margaret Powell    12 Niece

[brakn]

Thanks Pauline, that looks really good.

Does the last one (Powell) not give place of birth?

[PaulineJ]

As always, you should verify this info for yourself.
Pauline