Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: a right family mix-up  (Read 2491 times)

Offline scotia123

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: a right family mix-up
« Reply #9 on: Monday 02 November 09 09:10 GMT (UK) »
hi, thanks to all who have taken the time to post on this subject, all the points made have been looked at and yes I,ll be continuing to trace my mackenzie ancestors as far as I can and also be looking at the rose question as well once again thank you all

scotia123

Offline toni*

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,549
    • View Profile
Re: a right family mix-up
« Reply #10 on: Monday 02 November 09 10:03 GMT (UK) »
is there a possibility that one of your gt gt gt gt (etc)grandfathers was illegitimate son of Miss MacKenzie and therefore his father was a Rose but he used the surname MacKenzie, in which case wow you have proved the father of illegitimate child
 :)
Holman & Vinton- Cornwall, Wojciechowskyj & Hussak- Bukowiec & Zahutyn, Bentley & Richards- Leicester, Taylor-Kent/Sussex  Punnett-Sussex,  Bear/e- Monkleigh Gazey-Warwicks

UK Census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchive

Offline c-side

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,032
  • The 'three' now have a cousin
    • View Profile
Re: a right family mix-up
« Reply #11 on: Monday 02 November 09 19:56 GMT (UK) »
Please let us all know if you ever find an answer to your puzzle

Christine

Offline scotia123

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: a right family mix-up
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 05 November 09 12:49 GMT (UK) »
Hi Christine, still following up on the dna results as well as my mackenzie family line but will let you all know what transpires

Alex
Pages: 1 [2]