Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 ... 25

Author Topic: hankins  (Read 72739 times)

Offline dalek39

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: hankins
« Reply #126 on: Thursday 12 November 09 19:49 GMT (UK) »
Glamis... When I go up that way, if it is still there, will take a photo.. but will you all bail me out if I get arrested for breaching the privacy act? the owners may wonder what I am doing....selling their house...
 AND..me too...I agree, no more cross-overs.. my brain hurts.

Offline Lucy2

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,610
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: hankins
« Reply #127 on: Thursday 12 November 09 22:40 GMT (UK) »
Hi Dalek

Here's the cemetery record for Hannah Maria HANKINS :

HARKINS (sic) - Hannah Maria

aged 44 years

Interment Date :   17/01/1873* 
[* Note:  Month has been given incorrectly.]

Cemetery :    Hokitika

Grave:    Plot 2509   Block 174

Denomination :   Roman Catholic 
                               ----------------------                                    

http://www.westlanddc.govt.nz/index.cfm/0,291,html
["Cemetery catalogue" ]

(Unfortunately this particular cemetery database contains numerous typographical errors. Even my own g-gran is indexed under a weird spelling of her surname.  :D )

Lu

Offline Glamis

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: hankins
« Reply #128 on: Thursday 12 November 09 23:15 GMT (UK) »
Brilliant you've all recognised these burials and the errors. Well Found. Peace to them

Offline dalek39

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: hankins
« Reply #129 on: Thursday 12 November 09 23:18 GMT (UK) »
Glamis................now we can move on.....to the next stage...whats in store there. ::) :)

Offline Glamis

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: hankins
« Reply #130 on: Thursday 12 November 09 23:26 GMT (UK) »
Sort out the 'chilblains'- us who comes from who etc.

Offline dalek39

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: hankins
« Reply #131 on: Friday 13 November 09 00:13 GMT (UK) »
Chilblains  ??? dont quite follow... :)

Offline dalek39

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: hankins
« Reply #132 on: Friday 13 November 09 00:45 GMT (UK) »
Is Colwall  Hereford near Weston Beggard ?   I have a William Hankins and Mary Daffy married in 1755 in Colwell. Hereford.....date fits in ..just wondering at this stage... ???

Offline dalek39

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: hankins
« Reply #133 on: Friday 13 November 09 01:35 GMT (UK) »
Here we go again...... ::)  I have William Hankins,.. father of Richard Hankins,.. who is father of John Hankins Bartestree.   now.. William is married to Mary ?..  William died in 5 oct 1833..Weston Beggard..late of The Pidgeon House..(these dates are on the photo of the tombs in church grounds)
he was 65 years when he died..take that off death date, and we have born in 1768...now...
Mary, his wife ? born in 1735..Weston Beggard..died on 17 Apr. 1798  aged 63..which makes her born in 1735...which..by this makes him 33 yrs older than her....am I right??  The tomb of Mary confirms her dates as mine....what?, who? and How?   Help...!!

Offline Glamis

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: hankins
« Reply #134 on: Friday 13 November 09 08:24 GMT (UK) »
No, its the other way around, she was 33 years older than him. It wasn't uncommon. Well spotted though. However did you enhance those images_ Good work though.
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 ... 25