Hi Robyn,
Oh,

I tend to rely on the originals of records

and so I thank you for that link and the rationale on that RChat thread... ... I wish I were based in Tas to be able to get to the original baptismal records.... to help WIGGY more, alas, I'm not....
Looking carefully at
Original records ... umm.... often tis the best way to confirm or eliminate or mark as "possible, likely, probable" - but of course even those records can be factually incorrect.... (even when quite legible) for example, a lass may fib about her age when marrying or a grieving spouse may not hear a question properly and give his own mother's nee name instead of his mother-in-law's nee name when providing information for a death registration.... and of course so few people ever respond to a govt official with the answer "I don't know".....
But I think there's several days of quiet time needed to go through each and every record for baptisms in VDL 1816 - 1825, reading each one in full, carefully, before going onto the next entry.... rather than just consulting an online index - yes I know I use the online indexes regularly.... but for example, once I spot a likely RANSOM in a newspaper cutting.... I get to that "Primary Record" digitised on line.
So I use original records, and also primary records and also secondary records..firstly to try to match some of my own oral history tales with known facts... but I also realise that researching my own forebears using those techniques absorbs time, energy and funds... And I am sure you agree....
JM