Author Topic: Convicted by civil powers. For what? Completed  (Read 4902 times)

Offline North of Watford G

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 24
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convicted by civil powers. For what?
« Reply #36 on: Wednesday 07 October 09 18:56 BST (UK) »
 :-\

Your lucky at least you know who you elected, not like round here we haven't a clue seen no mention of whom ever in the local paper and fancy calling the area after some old wreck of a hall(Kirklees) they would have been better off naming it after what it as come Greater Huddersfield.

Cheers Roger.

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: Convicted by civil powers. For what?
« Reply #37 on: Wednesday 07 October 09 19:02 BST (UK) »
Deejay, Last time I saw Intake the area was suffering like much of the Doncaster area
North of Watford G I live 200 miles away now, but use this thing (the web) to keep up to date, take your point about Kirklees, could have happened at Doncaster too, where 17 local authorities were merged into one, but in that respect they were lucky. Many of the names were coined by civil servants who hadn't a clue about the area concderned, and really cared less.
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)

Offline North of Watford G

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 24
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convicted by civil powers. For what?
« Reply #38 on: Wednesday 07 October 09 19:03 BST (UK) »
 ???
Hi dee-jay,

I live 30 odd mile away from Donny northwards so I don't know it apart from seeing it on the destination blinds on the red busus that used to run in Donny.

Cheers Roger.

Offline muttly

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 89
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convicted by civil powers. For what?
« Reply #39 on: Wednesday 07 October 09 19:48 BST (UK) »
I've been 'highjacked" by other members either talking."in tongue" or in code!!!!
If that's a northern thing, than I guess I'll stick to being a "mutt" [hence the name!] Seriously I haven't a clue about the politics in that part of the world. it must be the same the world over!
And getting back on topic........I always thought tyke was a small child. I think i'll keep that definition! and I have yet to hear back from anyone in Hampshire.


Offline North of Watford G

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 24
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convicted by civil powers. For what?
« Reply #40 on: Wednesday 07 October 09 20:32 BST (UK) »
 :o
Hi muttley,

Thanks for pulling us back onto topic.

Cheers Roger.

Offline dee-jay

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 993
    • View Profile
Re: Convicted by civil powers. For what?
« Reply #41 on: Wednesday 07 October 09 21:00 BST (UK) »
What is your definition of Tyke?

Just a reminder of who it was that knocked us off course! ;D

I had responded from Hampshire but I don't think it very likely your answers will come from here.  Aldershot is close to Surrey and the Registration District I gave for their marriage was Farnham. 
SOM/Chard/Combe St Nicholas/Ilminster:  Dean[e]/Doble/Jeffery/Burt;  DEV/Yarcombe:  Dean/Gill/Every; 
BRK/Newbury:  Westall/Green/Lewis/Canning;  WIL/Allcannings:  Hiscock/Amor;  Froxfield:  Hobbs/Green;  HAM/Kingsclere:  Martin/Hiscock/Westall;  WAR/Marton/Bubbenhall:  Glenn/Holmes;  STS/Yoxall/Hamstall Ridware/Barton-u-Needwood:  Holmes/Dainty;  STS/Brewood/Codsall/Penkridge/Hatherton:  Dean[e]; GLA/Aberdare:  Dean/Dane

Census information: Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Little Nell

  • Global Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 11,928
    • View Profile
Re: Convicted by civil powers. For what?
« Reply #42 on: Wednesday 07 October 09 21:04 BST (UK) »
Quote
I've been 'highjacked" by other members either talking."in tongue" or in code!!!!

Quite  ::)

On topic please - or is this now complete?

Nell
All census information: Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline muttly

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 89
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Convicted by civil powers. For what?
« Reply #43 on: Wednesday 07 October 09 21:11 BST (UK) »
I love the "comerardery" [read that phonetically!] on this forum!
Yes, I have a few avenues now to explore. so Yes this is probably complete.
Thank you ALL.  Muttly

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: Convicted by civil powers. For what?
« Reply #44 on: Thursday 08 October 09 17:32 BST (UK) »
Perhaps you should amend the heading then Muttly by adding completed after what?
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)