I remember the Paxman one. My comment in this instance was a reflection of the fact that I had not previously known of the existence of 'labour importers' with promises of a good life and education etc.
I agree, Nick, that domestic servants could very much be in the same boat in terms of how mill workers and servants could be let down by promises of a better life and being far away from their families.
Actually, reading Elizabeth Gaskell novels, I believe domestic labour was a problem for the (growing) middle and upper classes in Manchester - and probably elsewhere as well. Mills offered more money often because the mill owners were not always responsible for their accommodation (although they might having housing to rent out). From the point of view of the millworkers, this could mean greater freedom.
The 'new' aspect of the 'labour importers' was probably to do with the sheer numbers of mill workers needed. A glut of workers in mill areas also meant that the mills were not dependent on the increasingly millitant millworkers who were demanding higher wages and better conditions.
Fiona