Hi Sharon,

I too have started to reach the point where I'm thinking that it really is time I started to put all of the information I've acquired into some sort of structured format...but it's knowing the best way to approach it, isn't it?
As you say, there's the method whereby you split your story into four branches, but then, how manageable (or unmanageable) does this become when working backwards and the need arises to introduce the previous generations?

Recently, I have been considering the approach of starting with the ancestor relevant to that line who is farthest back in time who you have the most information on, then working forwards. That way, to my way of thinking (others may disagree?) you can introduce direct lines,and all of their siblings etc, and then their marriage dates as they happen by date, dropping in as much or as little information on their parents or siblings as you like.
Whilst I haven't started yet, I'm thinking that this method may read better. Does anyone else have an opinion on this?
As regards family myths or unverified stories etc. I will probably in the course of writing simply state that while such things can't be confirmed etc 'it is believed that' or 'according to family legend' etc.
Well, they're my thoughts on how to progress...just need to get started on it myself now! Good luck.
Paul
EDIT: I also meant to say that I'd probably intersperse the family history with references to other key historical events i.e. who the ruling monarch was at the time or any other major events that may have ocurred just to sort of anchor the family history to its relevant point in time.
