Hi lizdb. Thanks for your help. I joined the 1911 census site and I paid the credits and downloaded a JPG file of both census returns. George does claim he's 51. He states he's a farm labourer and has been given the occupational code of 140 'Agricultural Labourers, Farm Servants - Not otherwise distinguished'. George Henry does seem to claim to be younger and younger at each census return. I can only assume that at his age by 1911, say in reality he's at least 66 years old, would he not lie about his age to keep his employment and have a roof over his head for his family? Or am I barking up the wrong tree thinking about ageist employers?
I think George Henry must have been quite illiterate as he seemed barely able to write his own signature, so perhaps that made him distrust those in authority and giving a true age?
You're correct, on granddad's birth certificate it does state Louisa Price formerly Vale. Thanks, I didn't know she'd been in service.
Thanks Spidermonkey, Isabel Annie Price was granddad's sister.
