« Reply #9 on: Thursday 07 May 09 12:41 BST (UK) »
I might be completely wrong here, but this photos seems more 1900+ than 1889.
Beautiful restores/colouring done by everyone 
Trish
I was about to say much the same

It looks far too modern to be 1889

Rachel
FOR RESTORATIONS PLEASE SCAN AT 300-600
Please do NOT use my restores without permission, unless you're the owner of the photo. Some of my restores are on flickr.com ~ rachel sc
my computer is an iMac
BANCE, BALLINGER, CHEES(E)MAN, CONNOR, COOK, COX, CRUTCHLEY,
DAWSON, FLYNN, FOLWELL, FORGAN, FORREST, HARRIS, KING, LOOKER,
MIDGLEY, OATES, ROE, SIM(M)S, WHITTINGTON