Hello Sue (sparrett),
What a fascinating piece of information!
Divorced, eh!!
It would be interesting to see those papers (if only to check whether it is genefinder's Alice Maude!). It doesn't seem to be entirely clear from the index which was the Petitioner and which the Respondent.
And let's hope that genefinder didn't already know about this but didn't pass on the info.

Raises lots of questions if it is the right Alice Maude - e.g. why would she subsequently apparently go by the name of her divorced husband, etc, etc ...
And what happened to Sydney BROWN ....
Anyway, it's a great find!
Let's hope more explanations are forthcoming ...
Best regards,
JAP