Hannah Jameson

[Faithen]

 Thanks carole,
you been a big help, any idea  how i would find them on 1911 were would I go and how much would it cost?
Have no way to search 1911 for free, but will keep on trying.

[Ecneps]

Hello Faithen

You can search the 1911 census free here:  http://www.1911census.co.uk/

then if you find the person, you can buy credits as shown on the website

For 10 credits (which cost between 83p and £1.16, depending on the package you buy) you can view a full transcript of everyone in the household, or a whole page of an institution.

Viewing the images of the household pages uses 30 credits, which costs from £2.50 to £3.48, depending on the package of credits that you buy.

Kind regards
Barbara
 

[CaroleW]

Hi

The 1911 for Northumberland is not yet available

[Faithen]

Thankyou Barbara
I have had a go unable to fin of hem at the moment but will keep trying.

[Ecneps]

Yes, sorry both, I was just answering with general information about searching the 1911 census and costs for transcripts, and omitted to mention that unfortunately it's not available for the Northumberland, Durham and North Yorkshire (and some other) areas yet, but should be by the summer, if you can wait a couple of months!

Kind regards
Barbara
 

[Faithen]

Still unable to find Hannah Jameson B 1850 blaydo??? on 1851-1861
No sign of that birth date any way
SOME THING IS WRONG HERE
EITHER THE NAME JAMESON OR DATE OF BIRTH CONFUSSED.

[Faithen]

Still unable to find Hannah Jameson B 1850 blaydon???
 on 1851-1861
No sign of that birth date any way
SOME THING IS WRONG HERE
EITHER THE NAME JAMESON OR DATE OF BIRTH CONFUSSED.!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have had a " digg about " and unable to turn up anything.
Jameson DO show up in North est but no Hannah Jameson B 1850?

[CaroleW]

Hannah's birthyear is 100% consistent between 1881-1901 - 1850 - but there is no birth reg in either Durham or Northumberland on freebmd.  I have also tried under Jamieson

Although Civil Reg was introduced in 1837 - it only became compulsory to register a birth from 1875.  Many births went unregistered.

There is no 1851 entry with a birthplace of Blaydon but birthplaces could change from census to census.  Hannah was a baby in 1851 so her parents may have shown a different area of Durham as her birthplace to the one she herself shows in later censuses

Gateshead was the registration district which included Blaydon

See my further reply below

[CaroleW]

I had this wonderful theory - unfortunately, as I researched it the flaws became obvious!!

What I really do think is that Hannah was illegitimate and her mother married after her birth.  The only Hannah with the right birthyear and birthplace on the 1851 is Hannah Robson - mother Jane father Thomas

I thought perhaps Thomas was previously married (2 older children in h/h) but there is no Robson/Jameson marriage between 1849-1851