Many thanks everyone for all your continued input!
Stoney -yes a shoot, that may be another possibility, as for any connections to big estates and the gentry, that would be a nice connection!! but not any that I know of.
His family paternal family were reasonably well off farmers, who mainly owned their farms freehold and moved from north Somerset to south glous in the 1860's. His maternal family were larger farmers, my grt grandfather's maternal grandfather inherited his father's large farm in Doynton Glous and was the Gloucestershire Farmer's Delegate to Canada and was invited to travel the country and sent reports of his experiences back to the local papers.
His uncle, inherited his paternal grandfather's farm and when he died suddenly in 1902, the estate amounted to approx. half a million pounds in todays money. So they may have allowed the hunt to use their land, or similarly a shoot to take place. Or they may have stabled some of the horses used in the hunt?
Deb - Yes some of them joined the army in WW1 and I can see what you mean with the strapping on his legs, but none were in the army (to my knowledge prior to the war.
Yes I wondered about the identity of the two older men, the smartly dressed guy who could either be as arran suggested, a hunt master, or a gentleman land owner, and the man on the chair who looks like he was a farmer or stable owner. As far as I have found out the family were well regarded locally, so it could have been a local landowner who had called in. - So perhaps some of them in the picture are related?
So far then it seems that we may have the stables for a hunt, the beaters for a shoot or a local gentleman/land owner and farmer.
Also was photography at that time (c.1890-1900) still done with a tripod camera with a man under a cloth?
Thanks,
acceber