Author Topic: 1911 census  (Read 88901 times)

Offline Sloe Gin

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,442
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 census
« Reply #342 on: Tuesday 20 January 09 18:01 GMT (UK) »
They have said in a reply to comments on the blog that they have deliberately transcribed all the spelling mistakes in the originals.  So if great- grandad wrote Herny and Frolence instead of Henry and Florence, Herny and Frolence is what's been transcribed and indexed.

How helpful.  Not.  >:(
UK census content is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk  Transcriptions are my own.

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 census
« Reply #343 on: Tuesday 20 January 09 18:05 GMT (UK) »
WALOB  ::)
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline plimmerian

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,411
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 census
« Reply #344 on: Tuesday 20 January 09 18:06 GMT (UK) »
is it not possible for them to do what ancestry has done ie:

Herny / Henry / Hry / H etc

and give all possible options listed alphabetically or on a star rating??  

am I making sense??

 :-[


Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,926
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 census
« Reply #345 on: Tuesday 20 January 09 18:09 GMT (UK) »
back to the debate about FindMyPast charging full-whack for images et al during the Beta-Test period - some were saying that it was still a 'priviledge' to be able to see their ancestors, despite being expected to 'test' and comment on mis-trans etc .....

Now we have 'quality issues' in the almost-final product, tis interesting to note how the views are skewing round to FindMyPast being the villain   ;)
They may have become a villian, but I still prefer them to the other villain  ::) ;)

Kerry
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....



Offline davidft

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 census
« Reply #347 on: Tuesday 20 January 09 18:13 GMT (UK) »
They have said in a reply to comments on the blog that they have deliberately transcribed all the spelling mistakes in the originals.  So if great- grandad wrote Herny and Frolence instead of Henry and Florence, Herny and Frolence is what's been transcribed and indexed.

How helpful.  Not.  >:(

Whether it is helpful or not it is the right way to do it.

First rule of transcribing is write what you see not what you think it should be.
James Stott c1775-1850. James was born in Yorkshire but where? He was a stonemason and married Elizabeth Archer (nee Nicholson) in 1794 at Ripon. They lived thereafter in Masham. If anyone has any suggestions or leads as to his birthplace I would be interested to know. I have searched for it for years without success. Thank you.

Offline louisa maud

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,604
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 census
« Reply #348 on: Tuesday 20 January 09 18:15 GMT (UK) »
newf
naughty naughty

LM
Census information is Crown Copyright,
from  www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Granath Sweden and London
Garner, Marylebone Paddington  Northolt Ilford
Garner, Devon
Garner New Zealand
Maddieson
Parkinson St Pancras,
Jenkins Marylebone Paddington
Mizon/Mison/Myson Paddington
Tindal Marylebone Paddington
Tocock, (name changed to Ellis) London
Southam Marylebone, Paddington
Bragg Lambeth 1800's
Edermaniger(Maniger) Essex Kent Canada (Toronto)
Coveney Kent Lambeth
Sondes kent and London

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 census
« Reply #349 on: Tuesday 20 January 09 18:19 GMT (UK) »
say it like it is .... in my book.

Yes, there will be instances where the Householder mis-spelled, but the number of other examples are already legion. My Father's middle name was very clear (and not because it was what I expected to see), and they managed to change it to David - which has just 3 letters in common, so guesswork at something they didnt recognise rather than write what was there ? !
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Sloe Gin

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,442
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 census
« Reply #350 on: Tuesday 20 January 09 18:21 GMT (UK) »

Whether it is helpful or not it is the right way to do it.

First rule of transcribing is write what you see not what you think it should be.

I can see that, but why not double-index the entries that appear to be misspellings.  Index Herny as both Herny AND Henry.
UK census content is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk  Transcriptions are my own.