1911 census

[kerryb]

The ones that come to my mind are Firny for the first part and how for the second part 

Mind you judging by some transcriptions I have seen in the past you might even want to try Phernyhough!!  Then you need to think about the way the F is written and what could it be mistaken for a T perhaps, a P??

Kerry

[peterbmillzz]

Cheers Kerry
I will give that a bash and see what happens.  My poor old brain is getting a bit fried

[kerryb]

Know the feeling Peter, I think I'm all 1911ed out!  Need to do something different 

Kerry

[peterbmillzz]

I did this earlier -

"Hi Cant find Muriel FERNYHOUGH 1902 - Macclesfield 3Q 8a 206  on the 1901 census, any suggestions re alternate (mistranscibed) surnames?"

Spot the Error (if you can?)

Peter

[Ringrose]

Ive just spent an enjoyable time looking at the census. I got the images for my directs and I did recognise the writing as being my 2 grandfathers and I think the 2 ggrandfathers are genuine.
I paid up yesterday and had trouble getting into search today but once that was done I was amazed how quick it was. Still got 3 missing names so will try variations tomorrow.I had trouble finding my grandma Hepzibah but when I eventually found it I could see why my granfathers writing had been mistranscribed.
I dont seem to have so many to look up on this census as I did on the 1901.
Ringrose

[genjen]

I did this earlier -

"Hi Cant find Muriel FERNYHOUGH 1902 - Macclesfield 3Q 8a 206  on the 1901 census, any suggestions re alternate (mistranscibed) surnames?"

Spot the Error (if you can?)

Peter

Bottom of the class for spelling, Peter!

[Berlin-Bob]

hi any one know when the 1911 is coming out on A******y,do we have to wait until 2011?
Steve

Will it be on Ancestry at all ??

This reply on another topic doesn't mention Ancestry, but it does explain a fundamental difference in the format of the data available.
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,353052.msg2313588.html#msg2313588

Bob

[Necromancer]

Any other companies wishing to host the 1911 census on their sites will have to purchase the digitised photos, and then do their own transcriptions and indexing. 

It's very unlikely that the National Archives will allow others access to the original documents, so companies will have to negotiate with Brightsolid for pricing.

assume you are referring to the fact that the 1911 was the last one on paper - Nat Archives hadnt filmed it ?

The points quoted above are just an opinion. So I'd say that the jury is still out - Ancestry have recently commented that their current focus is on older data - possibly an element of sour grapes, but doesnt preclude them adding the 1911 at some future date.

IMHO

[peterbmillzz]

genjen

as I said the poor old brain type devise is Fried somewhat so the spooling mistooks will come fick and thast.
 
Peert

Think I need a BEER......................