Thanks, Barbara.
What do you think?
Why would Juliah's JW say his father was deceased when he married in 1899 when, in 1901, he's clearly alive and living at home? I suppose it could have been an error by the registrar, but not likely.
Also, this John is a warehouseman in 1891 - Juliah's JW was a general labourer by the time of his marriage 8 years later - possible, but again not likely.
All in all, I think perhaps I've maligned the chap from Genes who discounted this family as Juliah's - I think he might be right!
Juliah, it's beginning to look as if you're going to have to order those 3 certificates and hope one (and only one!) of them has a father named William.
With his parents' names it should be easier to find him on the earlier censuses. Hopefully!!
(If you decide to go for the certificates, you will let us know how you get on, won't you?)
Jill