Author Topic: Name Signing Conventions  (Read 1227 times)

Offline Anig

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Name Signing Conventions
« on: Friday 05 December 08 06:58 GMT (UK) »
On most of the earlier marriage certicficates I've received, witnesses have signed their full names but for my Grandparents one (1948) that I received yesterday, the witnesses names have been transcribed with just their initials and surnames.  Did the way people gave their names change over the years?  I was really hoping for a better lead than just initials - trying to track down an elusive "Uncle Walter".  One of the witnesses is a 'W', but it's not conclusive.  ;)
Archer, Beaumont, Lockwood, Mellor (+1 associated Hoyle - not part of direct lineage), North, Sykes -- all based in Huddersfield, currently.

Offline aghadowey

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 52,580
    • View Profile
Re: Name Signing Conventions
« Reply #1 on: Friday 05 December 08 08:09 GMT (UK) »
I've often seen both witnesses and married couple use initials instead of a complete Christian name. Just as common is, as an example, a bride being listed as Mary J. Smith but signing the register as Mary Jane Smyth (her complete name and correct surname).
Away sorting out DNA matches... I may be gone for some time many years!

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,859
    • View Profile
Re: Name Signing Conventions
« Reply #2 on: Friday 05 December 08 09:24 GMT (UK) »
If it's any help, each time I've been a witness, I've used my normal signature of initials plus surname. On neither occasion was I asked to use my full name. I did sign with my first name plus initial on my own marriage cert though.

Gadget
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline GeoffE

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,995
  • Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Name Signing Conventions
« Reply #3 on: Friday 05 December 08 15:26 GMT (UK) »
At our daughter's wedding a few months ago, the groom and best man did their usual scribble which generally passes for a signature.  The vicar instructed them to print their names in full alongside.
Don't cry because its over. Smile because it happened.


Offline nessy

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
    • View Profile
Re: Name Signing Conventions
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 06 December 08 08:14 GMT (UK) »
At our daughter's wedding a few months ago, the groom and best man did their usual scribble which generally passes for a signature.  The vicar instructed them to print their names in full alongside.
Well done, the Vicar.  that will save someone the headache of searching in the future. :)
nessy
Whitegate: Mountfield/Mounfield, Yearsley, Glover.
Rudheath: Wilkinson
Lancashire: Mounfield/Clare/ Mills/Ellis.
St Helens: Clare
Coolgardie West Australia: Clare
Llanllyfni: Jones
Clynnog: Phillips
Wick McKay
Govan Seaton