Hi
I've been researching the Hulls of Romaldkirk, Durham and have reason to believe my gggg grandfather (Jonathan Hull) and his wife (Jane Hull) had a child (also Jane) in Transvaal. I don't know her exact birth date but she was christened in Sept 1825 in Romaldkirk. But her place of birth shows as West Skeen, Bank, Transvaal.
I found this info from a random google search which brought up the following page:
http://www.familysearch.org/Eng/Search/ancestorsearchresults.asp?LDS=0&last_name=hull&date_range=0&date_range_index=0&standardize=NMy questions are:
1) Where is West Skeen? Or Bank? I'm unsure whether this is a spelling mistake, a tiny place, a place name that's changed or the name of a ship even?
2) When I googled "Bank, Transvaal" I also brought up people on the same website (unrelated) who were born in "Windy, Bank, Transvaal" and "Dogger, Bank, Transvaal". All were christened in Britain. Why would this be?
3) I've read a little about British settlers around that time and it seems they would have been more likely to be in the Cape Colony rather than Transvaal.
I've searched the 1820 lists of passengers (on the 1820settlers website and theshiplist.com) and they weren't on any of them. I'm unsure when they went there, why they would have gone and where (exactly) they lived.
I'm also
presuming they were originally from Romaldkirk, or Britain, but I guess this could be wrong.
Sorry for the long list of Q's - hope someone can help!
Thanks,
Seed_Pod