Sorry, I did get the letter confused.
What we have been able to trace has been correct so far. (James Christie, tobacconist in Brewer Street, James Christie, and wife Elizabeth (Tobacconist) on three baptism records for John, James and William, etc)
The letter to James Scott Christie from his brother, and mentioning tid bits would have been handy to see, but we're slowly working through it all little bit by little bit.
Just caught next two posts!
craizi daizi: The James Christie who might be from Scotland was born about 1782, but, I've got so much Christie stuff around here, that you and me are going to have to see if we can find some common one's. I swear I could make up at least 4 other Christie trees! lol
jc23red: We've come to the conclusion that somewhere along the way, James birth year has been muddled up from 1818 to 1813. After seeing some of the writing from back then, it would be easy enough to do as well. All the records we're finding for him though, are putting the age closer to 1818. (York Convict Hulk for 1841 have him as 20, the Old Bailey records etc) The Baptism for James Christie is 1818, and considering the times, five years can be taken two ways for the length of time between a birth and baptism. Because kids were dying so young, you waited to see if they survived, or the dates are close to the birth in case a child did die young. If it was only one record that tended to put his birth year at 1818, then I'd take it with a grain of salt. It seems to be record after record though. We know he came out to Australia in 1842, and we've pretty much followed from present day backwards. We found a ticket of leave for when he married in Australia, the name of the ship he was transported in, etc. So we know we've got the right one, the 1818 seems to be one of the only hiccups though