Author Topic: Gloucestershire Baptism abt 1864[Completed Thanks]  (Read 1290 times)

Offline perry1

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 99
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Gloucestershire Baptism abt 1864[Completed Thanks]
« on: Monday 06 October 08 18:32 BST (UK) »
I am looking for the baptism of :-
Henry Frederick Arthur Wigley Bn Abt 1864.
Son of William & Sarah.

I have checked the Forest of Dean site, his brothers and sisters are there but he is missing.

I hope someone can help please
regards  Eddie

Offline manx-kayt

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 13
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Gloucestershire Baptism abt 1864
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 07 October 08 10:48 BST (UK) »
FreeBMD has a marriage record for Apr-Jun 1863 (Cheltenham 6a 681) for a   William Henry WIGLEY who (potentially) married a Sarah PEAT.

If this is correct, then Henry Frederick Arthur Wigley may have been born in Cheltenham rather than in the Forest of Dean with his siblings.   Hope this helps   :-\
Sweet
Maddox
Maddocks

Offline catylou

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 28
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Gloucestershire Baptism abt 1864
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 07 October 08 10:57 BST (UK) »
Have you seen this site? http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~wrag44/index.htm It has lots of Parish Register transcripts for different areas of Gloucester/shire.

Good luck!

Cate.
BKS: Godfrey, Lineham
DBY: Pickerin, Read, Swann, Wragg
GLS: Sutton, Smith, Hampton
SAL: Cooke, Griffiths, Tudor
STS: Walker, Dewsberry

Offline perry1

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 99
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Gloucestershire Baptism abt 1864
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 07 October 08 11:32 BST (UK) »
Cate,

Thank you, just checked, no luck
Eddie

ps. his parents where  married in Cheltenham. it is just that all census returns state  he was born in Pauntley, they could be wrong or he was not baptised