Author Topic: Bradbury family  (Read 4494 times)

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:21 BST (UK) »
lost in Wales - ah, well found Galium !


I was gonna suggest getting the Wimbledon born James Birth Cert to find Mum's maiden name ...

Births Dec 1881   
 
BRADBURY  James    Kingston  v2a p303


But if Carol has found her    :)
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,604
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:21 BST (UK) »
1881

At 81 Palmerstone Road Wimbledon. I think it says Brown although A*****y have corrected  ::) it to read Demon  :o

Bessie J Brown 39 on the parish born Padstow (can't read if she's married or widowed)
Charles W son 6 scholar b Cardiff Sth Wales
Lilly L dau 2 b Cardiff
Jane Demon(or Lemon) mother W and a ? age 63 on the parish b Padstow


RG11/831 folio 58 page 4

Carol
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:23 BST (UK) »
Brilliant !

So Charles only 6 ! pain  :P

Now we have to find what Wm the elder was calling himself in previous years !

The Browns werent that far away from the Bradburys were they !
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #30 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:34 BST (UK) »
Gotim !

RG11/820; Folio: 28; Page: 50

He's Thomas in 1881 - same street as 1891, but with wife Ann. and a LOT of kids  ???


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #31 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:39 BST (UK) »
Oh no - cant see Ann's death, nor that of youngest child shown in 1881 - Edwin  ???

Here we go again  :P
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,604
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #32 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:41 BST (UK) »
Well done Newfster..... ;)

My  8) what a lot of kids.......should that be John Thomas perhaps  :P


Seriously though,either the enumerator made a mistake and copied his name down wrongly or he is really Thomas and changed it to William to make a new life?

Have to get tea now so don't have time to find Ann and the kdis in 1891- sorry!

Carol
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #33 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:42 BST (UK) »
LOL - must be brothers ?

Thomas family - wife Ann is there in 1891 too

RG12/595; Folio 72; Page 12
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,604
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #34 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:45 BST (UK) »
I've just found that too  ;D ;D ;D

Oh well back to the drawing board.........mind you if we can find Thomas's parents and they're brothers................

Carol
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #35 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:48 BST (UK) »
Thomas has died by 1901 ..... Ann still around.


Yes, good point Carol.

wonder if the IGI, despite gap will show a Bradbury family having kids in that period ?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk